Introduction

This take$-$home, research$-$based exam requires you to apply your understanding of business and employment law within the context of British Columbia to analyze the legal and ethical dimensions of a workplace dispute involving an employee named John. The scenario involves several key issues, including childcare leave, last$-$minute cancellation of approved leave, internal promotion practices, and termination procedures.

Exam Instructions

Scenario Overview:

John, an immigrant and a dedicated employee, faced a sudden revocation of his previously approved child$-$care leave, leading to a series of events that culminated in his termination. This situation is complicated by past internal promotion disputes and interpersonal conflicts within the company.

Your Task:

Analyze the case, considering British Columbia's employment law statutes and relevant legal principles. Focus on potential claims John might have against his employer, including wrongful dismissal, and suggest the best course of remedies.

Areas to Consider:

Jurisdiction & Applicable Laws: Discuss the jurisdiction of British Columbia and the specific employment laws that apply to this case.

Leave Entitlements & Requests: Examine the legal aspects of leave entitlements, particularly relating to child care, and the implications of the GM$\text{'}$s verbal approval.

Termination Procedures & Dismissal: Analyze the termination process, the adequacy of the notice provided, and the grounds for dismissal, considering the details provided in the termination letter.

Discrimination & Workplace Relations: Consider any elements of discrimination or unfair treatment, especially relating to the internal promotion process and the interpersonal conflict with the other manager.

Potential Remedies & Legal Outcomes: Suggest possible legal remedies for John, including compensation for wrongful dismissal $($if determined$),$ and discuss the likelihood of success should the case proceed to court.

Word Limit: $1500-1700$ words

Format: Your analysis must be structured, well$-$argued, and formatted according to APA guidelines, with appropriate citations.

Submission: Submit your analysis in Week $10$Final Exam$$ Submission box latest by EOD March $22,2024$

Evaluation Rubric:

Understanding of Relevant Laws $(30\%)$: Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of employment law statutes relevant to the scenario.

Analytical Thinking $(30\%)$: Effectively analyzes the situation, identifies legal issues, and applies relevant laws to the facts.

Recommendations and Remedies $(20\%)$: Provides well$-$reasoned recommendations for potential legal remedies and outcomes.

Clarity and Organization $(10\%)$: Presents information clearly and logically$,$ following APA formatting guidelines.

Use of Evidence and Precedents $(10\%)$: Incorporates relevant legal precedents and evidence to support arguments.

Materials Provided:

Case scenario and termination letter

Note: Focus on the legal aspects of the case, avoiding personal opinions or unsupported assertions. Your analysis should demonstrate a deep understanding of employment law principles and their application to real$-$world situations.

THE CASE

AN EMPLOYMENT SITUATION

John was an immigrant who came to Canada with his family four years ago. He was a retail manager in his home country when he left the job and came here. He searched for a new job for a couple of months before landing his first survival job. It was working for a tire selling company as a customer service rep. John was happy to find a new job even though it was not up to his caliber. John worked hard on his new career and soon got promoted to the assistant manager's position. He kept working in this company for the next three years. During these three years, he was promoted continuously. By the starting of last year, he was already a manager in his company. During this time, his wife upgraded and became a teacher in a local school.

Teachers in Canada and most of the districts must attend a day of professional development day every month. Last year, in September, John's wife needed to participate in her professional development day. It happened to be the last Monday and the last day of the month. John requested a leave from his boss $($the GM$)$ a week before to look after his kids. John's boss was in a hurry and told him that he could take the child$-$care leave. In their company, they just needed to write it on the Whiteboard in the GM$\text{'}$s office$-$ the name and date of the person who is going to be absent$.$ John did what his general manager told him and told his wife that he could get the leave.

The Scene

In this scene, we'll delve into the dialogue between John and his boss, the General Manager $($GM$),$ as John requests leave to care for his children while his wife attends her professional development day. The conversation takes place in a bustling office environment, with the GM appearing to be in the midst of a hectic schedule.

John: Excuse me$,$ do