1. Is it false that public morality consists of the set of ethical norms and values that constrain how individuals act privately in society?
2. Is it true that in a fiduciary relationship, the principal is the party whose interests are formally represented by the agent acting as a fiduciary?
3. Is it true an important aspect of Kant's humanity formulation of the categorical imperative is that one must always treat a human person as an end in themselves as never merely as a means?
4. In Kant's humanity formulation of the categorical imperative, when he says "always as an end and never merely as a means" does it mean that you respect their intrinsic value and autonomy to make decisions about their own life? Or does he mean people are not obligated to do their ethical duty if it is overridden by other ethical considerations?
5. Is the focus of ethics of care is on maximizing prosocial virtues or the focus is on how our relationship of care should factor into our moral reasoning?