Is it truly in the nation's best interest to have the Supreme Court bending to the will of the people? If the Constitution protects individual freedoms by protecting those representing minority voices (which I mean in the broadest sense, not necessarily just those of certain recognized racial, gender, or other similar categories), then does it make sense to protect Constitutional principles by appointing only justices who will bend to the will of the majority voice of the people? What do you think? Are there historical lessons from which we can draw from other tumultuous periods in the country's past that involved public discontent with the Supreme Court's tendencies at that time?