It has been said that the testimony of forensic experts can dominate a trial. Conduct some internet research on a well-documented death investigation trial, focusing on the forensic evidence presentations and experts (for example, the Casey Anthony trial or the Scott Peterson trial). Do you believe each side presented the information as best they could? Do you think the experts maintained their integrity and honesty throughout the testimony? If you simply looked at the physical evidence, would you consider the defendant guilty of the crimes they were charged with?