It is commonly believed that the extravagant price of health care has been attributed to the involvement of private enterprises, despite it being a fundamental need of every resident. The principle advantage of private health hospitals is that they offer better facilities than state-own institutions, while the main disadvantage is their high treatment cost making ordinary people impossible to access the healthcare services they need. This essay agrees that its demerit outweigh the merit.

To begin with, providing high-grade equipment and labour force are the principle advantage of private medical care. This is because a private company makes enormous profits from the treatment fee of its patients, which is relatively higher than that in public hospitals. Consequently, a big proportion of this profit is invested back in equipping more advanced medical machines and facilities, as well as hiring and training top-notch specialists to serve its client

However, the main disadvantage of the private healthcare system is the high price itself. To be more specific, only the affluent have enough money to pay for the examination and operation which are conducted in private hospitals, while a person with low salaries may struggle to pay for medical bills. For example, a survey in 2019 indicates that an ordinary office worker would need up to one year to compensate for the money spent on one visit to a private hospital for general health examination. As a result, such poor people would not have equal access to the services in profit-making hospitals, despite receiving medical treatment is a basic necessity.

In conclusion, although profit-oriented hospitals may offer equipments with higher quality than government-owned clinics, their high medical costs still outweigh this merit. If the private sector offers a supportive policy to lower the treatment fee, more people would have equal access to its state-of-the-art facilities which it provides.