It is the same exercise and same data as the Research Study: SAT and College GPA but my questions are the following: 1. Do students who have a higher High School GPA also have a higher University GPA. 2. Do students who have a higher Math SAT score have a higher Computer Science grade point point score? Set up the hypothesis and conduct appropriate tests to arrive at your conclusions for both these research questions.

Studenti GPA mach SAT Verb SAT com GPA UW_SPA 10001 3.65 5 3.52 10003 2.78 55 512 2.87 2.93 10 1000) 2.32 53 503 2.54 24 11 10004 3.57 685 603 383 3:47 30005 592 3.23 1.47 Overview When deciding whether to admit an applicant, colleges take lots of factors, such as grades, sports, activities, leadership positions, awards, teacher recommendations, and test scores, into consideration. Using SAT scores a basis of whether to admit a student or not has created some controversy. Among other things, people question whether the SATs are fair and whether they predict collere performance. This study examines the SAT and GPA information of 105 students who graduated from a state university with a 3.S. in computer science, LOOS 10007 2.1 562 573 486 2.37 14 14 26 IS 35 18 19 20 10008 10000 10010 10011 10012 10010 10014 10015 1001G 10017 10010 10019 10020 10023 2.36 2.47 3.51 343 2.14 2.59 146 1.51 3.68 3.31 3.72 536 583 $91 649 532 582 524 559 552 617 684 568 654 513 642 653 701 203 2.81 141 361 2.48 3.31 3.52 1.43 2.52 3.84 3.84 2-14 2.21 3.17 2.24 3.02 332 1.59 254 3.19 3.71 1:58 3.4 73 619 642 Design Issues The conclusions from this study should not be generalized to students of other majors. Descriptions of Variables Variable Description high_GPA High school grade point average math SAT Math SAT.COM verb SAT Verbal SAT score comp GPA Computer science grade point average univ GPA Overall hersity gradie point average 2 25 3.49 712 564 557 591 26 21 23 652 501 549 584 2.25 2.48 1.09 2.37 2.29 YOUR RESEARCH QUESTIONS 2 552 3.01 1.19 3.28 10022 10023 ID togas 10026 10037 10023 599 602 619 700 273 2.46 332 361 3.82 264 71 72 11 34 33 1. Do students who have a Nigher High School grade point average also have a higher University grade point average? 2. Do students who have a higher Math SAT score have a higher Computer Science grade point score? Set up the hypothesis and conduct appropriate testatoare your condusions for both the research questions. Remember ye 519 558 221 732 53 317 101 172 3.78 2.51 2.1 Section 1 361 3.81 50 562 22 Instructions Section Section in + HTML Text Query All Edit LINS A76 x fx 10069 C B D E G UL H 34 10027 2.64 580 538 35 10028 2.19 562 507 36 10029 3.34 683 648 37 10030 3.48 717 724 38 10031 3.56 701 714 39 10032 3.81 691 684 40 10033 3.92 714 706 41 10034 4 689 673 42 10035 2.52 554 507 43 10036 2.71 564 543 44 10037 3.15 668 604 45 10038 3.22 691 662 46 10039 2.29 573 591 47 10040 2.03 568 517 48 10041 3.14 607 624 49 10042 3.52 651 683 50 10043 2.91 604 583 51 10044 2.83 560 542 52 10045 2.65 604 617 53 10046 2.41 574 548 54 10047 2.54 564 500 55 10048 2.66 607 528 56 10049 3.21 619 573 57 10050 3.34 647 608 58 10051 3.68 651 683 59 10052 2.84 571 543 60 10053 2.74 583 510 61 10054 2.71 554 538 02 10055 2.24 568 519 63 10056 2.48 574 602 10057 3.14 605 619 65 10058 2.83 591 584 66 10059 3.44 642 67 10060 2.89 608 573 68 10061 2.67 574 69 538 10062 3.24 643 607 70 10063 3.29 608 649 71 10064 709 688 32 10065 3.94 691 645 10066 3.42 662 583 74 10067 3.52 656 609 75 10068 554 542 76 10069 1.29 692 27 563 10070 FRA 572 Instructions Section 2.51 2.1 3.21 3.68 3.48 3.71 3.81 3.84 2.09 2.17 2.98 3.28 2.74 2.19 3.28 3.68 3.17 3.17 3.31 3.07 2.38 2.94 2.84 3.17 3.72 2.17 2.42 2.49 3.38 2.07 3.22 2.71 3.31 3.28 3.19 3.24 2.4 2.21 3.58 3.51 3.62 3.6 3.65 3.76 2.27 2.35 3.17 3.47 3 2.74 3.37 3.54 3.28 3.39 3.28 3.19 2.52 3.08 3.01 3.42 3.6 2.4 2.83 2.38 3.21 2.24 3.4 3.07 3.52 3.47 3.08 3.38 3.41 3.64 3.71 3.01 3:37 2.34 3.29 608 3.53 3.87 3.72 3.98 1.09 3.42 2.07 3.17 2.24 Section 11 Section II + Stocks Geogra. HTML Text Query All Edit Links A113 fc END OF SECTION II B D E F G H 688 645 583 609 542 563 672 649 708 608 3.21 71 10064 3.87 72 10065 3.94 73 10066 3.42 74 10067 3.52 75 10068 2.24 76 10069 3.29 77 10070 3.41 78 10071 3.56 79 10072 3.61 80 10073 3.28 82 10074 82 10075 3.48 83 10076 3.62 84 10077 2.92 85 10078 2.81 86 10079 3.11 87 10080 3.28 88 10081 2.7 89 10082 2.62 90 10083 3.72 91 10084 3.42 92 10085 3.51 93 10016 3.28 94 10087 3.42 10058 3.9 SG 10089 3.12 10090 2.83 10091 2.09 99 10082 3:17 100 10093 3.28 101 10094 3.02 S02 10095 3.42 103 1009 1.06 104 10097 103 1009 115 104 10095 10100 2.4 108 10101 10 10102 3:41 1010) 3.07 10164 709 691 667 656 554 692 684 717 712 641 675 692 684 564 554 685 671 571 582 621 651 673 651 672 591 582 609 554 612 628 567 619 691 564 632 698 609 591 509 694 609 503 591 589 642 681 640 607 587 612 555 480 590 580 602 623 3.72 3.98 3.09 3.42 2.07 3.17 3.51 3.49 3.51 3.4 3.38 3.54 3.48 3.09 3.14 3.28 3.41 3.02 2.97 4 3.34 3.28 3.32 3.51 3.68 3.07 2.78 3.68 3.64 3.71 3.01 3.37 2.34 3.29 3.4 3.38 3.28 3.31 3.42 3.39 3.51 3.17 3.2 3.41 3.29 3.17 3.12 3.71 3.5 3.34 3,48 3.44 3.59 3.28 3 3.42 3.41 3.49 3.28 3.34 3.17 3.07 115 684 2.15 111 2.17 1.24 23 3:28 2.29 55: LOS 492 541 50 2.74 3:42 692 3.1 2.76 END OF CHONI Bection Studenti GPA mach SAT Verb SAT com GPA UW_SPA 10001 3.65 5 3.52 10003 2.78 55 512 2.87 2.93 10 1000) 2.32 53 503 2.54 24 11 10004 3.57 685 603 383 3:47 30005 592 3.23 1.47 Overview When deciding whether to admit an applicant, colleges take lots of factors, such as grades, sports, activities, leadership positions, awards, teacher recommendations, and test scores, into consideration. Using SAT scores a basis of whether to admit a student or not has created some controversy. Among other things, people question whether the SATs are fair and whether they predict collere performance. This study examines the SAT and GPA information of 105 students who graduated from a state university with a 3.S. in computer science, LOOS 10007 2.1 562 573 486 2.37 14 14 26 IS 35 18 19 20 10008 10000 10010 10011 10012 10010 10014 10015 1001G 10017 10010 10019 10020 10023 2.36 2.47 3.51 343 2.14 2.59 146 1.51 3.68 3.31 3.72 536 583 $91 649 532 582 524 559 552 617 684 568 654 513 642 653 701 203 2.81 141 361 2.48 3.31 3.52 1.43 2.52 3.84 3.84 2-14 2.21 3.17 2.24 3.02 332 1.59 254 3.19 3.71 1:58 3.4 73 619 642 Design Issues The conclusions from this study should not be generalized to students of other majors. Descriptions of Variables Variable Description high_GPA High school grade point average math SAT Math SAT.COM verb SAT Verbal SAT score comp GPA Computer science grade point average univ GPA Overall hersity gradie point average 2 25 3.49 712 564 557 591 26 21 23 652 501 549 584 2.25 2.48 1.09 2.37 2.29 YOUR RESEARCH QUESTIONS 2 552 3.01 1.19 3.28 10022 10023 ID togas 10026 10037 10023 599 602 619 700 273 2.46 332 361 3.82 264 71 72 11 34 33 1. Do students who have a Nigher High School grade point average also have a higher University grade point average? 2. Do students who have a higher Math SAT score have a higher Computer Science grade point score? Set up the hypothesis and conduct appropriate testatoare your condusions for both the research questions. Remember ye 519 558 221 732 53 317 101 172 3.78 2.51 2.1 Section 1 361 3.81 50 562 22 Instructions Section Section in + HTML Text Query All Edit LINS A76 x fx 10069 C B D E G UL H 34 10027 2.64 580 538 35 10028 2.19 562 507 36 10029 3.34 683 648 37 10030 3.48 717 724 38 10031 3.56 701 714 39 10032 3.81 691 684 40 10033 3.92 714 706 41 10034 4 689 673 42 10035 2.52 554 507 43 10036 2.71 564 543 44 10037 3.15 668 604 45 10038 3.22 691 662 46 10039 2.29 573 591 47 10040 2.03 568 517 48 10041 3.14 607 624 49 10042 3.52 651 683 50 10043 2.91 604 583 51 10044 2.83 560 542 52 10045 2.65 604 617 53 10046 2.41 574 548 54 10047 2.54 564 500 55 10048 2.66 607 528 56 10049 3.21 619 573 57 10050 3.34 647 608 58 10051 3.68 651 683 59 10052 2.84 571 543 60 10053 2.74 583 510 61 10054 2.71 554 538 02 10055 2.24 568 519 63 10056 2.48 574 602 10057 3.14 605 619 65 10058 2.83 591 584 66 10059 3.44 642 67 10060 2.89 608 573 68 10061 2.67 574 69 538 10062 3.24 643 607 70 10063 3.29 608 649 71 10064 709 688 32 10065 3.94 691 645 10066 3.42 662 583 74 10067 3.52 656 609 75 10068 554 542 76 10069 1.29 692 27 563 10070 FRA 572 Instructions Section 2.51 2.1 3.21 3.68 3.48 3.71 3.81 3.84 2.09 2.17 2.98 3.28 2.74 2.19 3.28 3.68 3.17 3.17 3.31 3.07 2.38 2.94 2.84 3.17 3.72 2.17 2.42 2.49 3.38 2.07 3.22 2.71 3.31 3.28 3.19 3.24 2.4 2.21 3.58 3.51 3.62 3.6 3.65 3.76 2.27 2.35 3.17 3.47 3 2.74 3.37 3.54 3.28 3.39 3.28 3.19 2.52 3.08 3.01 3.42 3.6 2.4 2.83 2.38 3.21 2.24 3.4 3.07 3.52 3.47 3.08 3.38 3.41 3.64 3.71 3.01 3:37 2.34 3.29 608 3.53 3.87 3.72 3.98 1.09 3.42 2.07 3.17 2.24 Section 11 Section II + Stocks Geogra. HTML Text Query All Edit Links A113 fc END OF SECTION II B D E F G H 688 645 583 609 542 563 672 649 708 608 3.21 71 10064 3.87 72 10065 3.94 73 10066 3.42 74 10067 3.52 75 10068 2.24 76 10069 3.29 77 10070 3.41 78 10071 3.56 79 10072 3.61 80 10073 3.28 82 10074 82 10075 3.48 83 10076 3.62 84 10077 2.92 85 10078 2.81 86 10079 3.11 87 10080 3.28 88 10081 2.7 89 10082 2.62 90 10083 3.72 91 10084 3.42 92 10085 3.51 93 10016 3.28 94 10087 3.42 10058 3.9 SG 10089 3.12 10090 2.83 10091 2.09 99 10082 3:17 100 10093 3.28 101 10094 3.02 S02 10095 3.42 103 1009 1.06 104 10097 103 1009 115 104 10095 10100 2.4 108 10101 10 10102 3:41 1010) 3.07 10164 709 691 667 656 554 692 684 717 712 641 675 692 684 564 554 685 671 571 582 621 651 673 651 672 591 582 609 554 612 628 567 619 691 564 632 698 609 591 509 694 609 503 591 589 642 681 640 607 587 612 555 480 590 580 602 623 3.72 3.98 3.09 3.42 2.07 3.17 3.51 3.49 3.51 3.4 3.38 3.54 3.48 3.09 3.14 3.28 3.41 3.02 2.97 4 3.34 3.28 3.32 3.51 3.68 3.07 2.78 3.68 3.64 3.71 3.01 3.37 2.34 3.29 3.4 3.38 3.28 3.31 3.42 3.39 3.51 3.17 3.2 3.41 3.29 3.17 3.12 3.71 3.5 3.34 3,48 3.44 3.59 3.28 3 3.42 3.41 3.49 3.28 3.34 3.17 3.07 115 684 2.15 111 2.17 1.24 23 3:28 2.29 55: LOS 492 541 50 2.74 3:42 692 3.1 2.76 END OF CHONI Bection