Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
It's already given that slavery was an economic success for the New World. Its also a given that the Slaves were also not considered human,
It's already given that slavery was an economic success for the "New World". Its also a given that the Slaves were also not considered "human", but property, so its not surprising to see how slavery and capitalism are comparable items. In the article, Getz argument was that capitalism and slavery existed WITH the other acting as sibling systems. The growth of textiles and goods relied on human labor, that's it. It would've took massive amounts of human labor to reach the successful return of investments and profits. Economic success whether it was forced labor or "negotiable" employee/employer relationship, they both worked hand in hand to propel the New World innovations and businesses for generational wealth
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started