Its fine to post before then, once youve had a chance to review my feedback from Wks6-7Dsc, for you and/or your classmates, applicable lecture notes, and/or video lectures/other linked materials, in addition to your chosen case. You will post the assignment in this forum, as a discussion post. You may first reserve a case for your individual presentation (the last of your three assignments), like you did for Wks6-7Dsc, and then post your actual assignment when you have completed it,but may not choose a case already chosen by another student.You may not reserve a case from the list below unless/until you have completed the Wks6-7Dsc posting.Be sure to check the information about the individual presentation I will post as an attachment to this forum (including how to organize your post, and what to include in your post). I might also be able to do a chat in Week 8 or Week 9 about the individual presentation assignment, so please check the Week 8 and Week 9 overview pages and Announcements for an update about that. Also,please do not finalize your post until you have reviewed all the available course information about your topic(in the online text, if applicable, in other reading links or YouTube video links posted, or in the lecture notes, for example). In your initial Individual Presentation post, make sure that you indicatethe case you have chosen from the list below.Be sure you review any reply I post to yourand/or other students Wks6-7Dsc postings, including any Week 8 or Week 9 Chat about the assignment.

I will try to post the notes for Weeks8 and beyondASAP, which could be applicable to a students presentation, to assist you in preparing for your presentation. As mentioned above,to maximize your individual presentation assignment points,besides the case, itself,you will want to review the lecture notes, and watch any applicable portion of the YouTube lecturesbefore finalizing your presentation post(this should help you at least with the general law discussion), as well as review my reply post to yourand/or other students' Wks6-7Dsc posting, including any applicable Chat, and the additional information Ihave posted as an attachmentto this forum about the individual presentations.

Here are the cases from which to choose:

LakewoodCreative Costumers v. Sharp, 509 N.E.2d 77 (1986) (Enforceable liquidated damages clause?) (Tian has chosen)

Northwest Motors v. James,118 Wn.2d 294 (1992)(accord and satisfaction issue, only) (Aliz has chosen)

Pisani Construction, Inc. v. Krueger, 791 A.2d 634 (2002) (Whether substantial performance occurred, requiring owners payment for work performed) (Hang has chosen)

Walker v. Herke, 20 Wn.2d 239 (1944) (Was there anticipatory repudiation, and what result in this case?)

Vuylsteke v. Broan,17 P.3d 1072 (2001) (mitigation of damages) (Holly has chosen)

MikeBuilding& Contracting v. Just Homes, LLC, 901 N.Y.S.2d 458 (2010)(condition precedent aspect of the case, onlythis is covered in the first part of a long case)

Kysar v. Lambert, 76 Wn.App. 460 (1995) (contract formation and nonconforming goods issues under the UCC in WA) (Patrick has chosen)

Harper and Associates v. Printers,46 Wn.App. 417 (1986) (types of damages and defenses available in contracts for the sale of goods under the UCC)

Udall v. T.D. Escrow Servs., Inc., 159 Wn. 2d. 903 (2007) (agents apparent authority only)

Tacoma Fixture Company, Inc. v. Rudd Company, Inc.,142 Wn.App. 547 (2008) (whether additional terms become part of a contract between merchants; exceptions)

Monty v. Peterson,85 Wn.2d 956 (1975) (agents duties to principal) (Amanda has chosen)

Curley Electric, Inc. v. Bills, 130 Wn.App. 114 (2005) (formation of partnership and effect on suits against partner)(Fabi has chosen as her makeup case for Wks8-11Dsc)

Kalmas v. Wagner, 133 Wn.2d 210 (1997) (tenant's expectation of privacy and landlord rights under the Landlord-Tenant Act) (Michelle has chosen)

Dickens v. Alliance Analytical Labs, L.L.C.,127 Wn.App. 433 (2005) (concepts of LLC member/manager personal liability and piercing the corporate veil in LLCs, only)

Cagle v. Burns and Roe, Inc.,106 Wn.2d 911 (1986)(damages for wrongful termination in violation of public policy)(David has chosen)

Tenco, Inc. v. Manning, 59 Wn.2d 479 (1962) (Applicability of the equitable remedies of reformation and specific performance)

State v. Schwab, 103 Wn.2d 542 (1985) (relationship between the Landlord-Tenant Act and the Consumer Protection Act) (Fabi has chosen)

Corr v. Willamette Industries, 105 Wn.2d 217 (1986) (dual purpose doctrine and exclusive remedy of workers compensation law)

Hop Producers v. Goschie Farms, 112 Wn.2d 694 (1989) (Performance discharged under frustration of purpose doctrine?) (Feifan has chosen)

Interlake Porsche v. Bucholz,45 Wn.App. 502 (1986) (breach of corporate fiduciary duty and liability for damages, only)

Aubreys R.V. Center v. Tandy Corp., 46 Wn.App. 595 (1987) (Was a rescission remedy proper?)

International Airport Centers, L.L.C. v. Citrin,440 F.3d 418 (7th Cir. 2006) (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and agents duty of loyalty) (Han has chosen for makeup for Wks8-11Dsc)

Kamla v. Space Needle Corp., 147 Wn.2d 114 (2002)(liability of landowner to independent contractors employee) (Abdulhameed has chosen)

American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells Orchards, 115 Wn.2d 217 (1990) (consequential damages and validity of consequential damages exclusion clauses in contracts)

Westby v. Gorsuch, 112 Wn.App. 558 (2002) (damages in action for fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation) (Jeffrey has chosen)

Griffin v. West RS, Inc.,143 Wn.2d 81 (2001) (landlord's duty of care to tenant) (Han has chosen)

Campbell Soup Company v. Wentz,172 F.2d 80(3rd Cir. 1949) (unconscionability) (Jazzmine has chosen)

Hornback v. Wentworth,132 Wn.App. 504 (2006) (supervening illegality/impossibility of performance and remedies)

Bazak International Corp. v. Tarrant Apparel Group,378 F.Supp.2d 377 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (sufficiency of writing requirement and signature under the Statute of Frauds in contracts for the sale of goods) (Chrysta has chosen)