Question
I've always viewed criminal law as 1) crimes against property and 2) crimes against people. I've always been more concerned about harming a person and
I've always viewed criminal law as 1) crimes against property and 2) crimes against people. I've always been more concerned about harming a person and somewhat less concerned to losing/damaging property (since things can be replaced). So let's proceed down these 2 paths this week and see where it takes us.
Do you agree? If people valued people over things or property, then why do people kill people for money or other things/property?
Should burglary be a tort and denting a fender a crime?why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Employment Law For Business
Authors: Dawn Bennett Alexander, Laura P Hartman
6th Edition
978-0073377636, 73377635, 978-0077347383
