IYT-7 Please do not copy other answers. This is a different question. If copied from other answers I will downvote and report your account .

Q1.

Q2.

Alpha, a parent company with one subsidiary, Beta, is preparing the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ending 31 March 20X5. The draft statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income are as follows: Alpha Beta $'000 $'000 Revenue (Note 2) 64,800 39,000 Cost of sales (Notes 2 and 4) (26,000) (16,000) Gross profit 38,800 23,000 Distribution costs (5,000) (2,000) Administrative expenses (9,000) (3,500) Investment income (Notes 1 and 3) 7,000 0 Finance costs (Note 1) (4,000) (2,500) Profit before tax 27,800 15,000 Income tax expense (7,000) (4,000) Profit for the year 20,800 11,000 Other comprehensive income: Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss: Gains on property revaluation (Note 4) 5,000 3,000 Other comprehensive income for the year: 5,000 3,000 - Total comprehensive income for the year 25,800 14,000 Note 1 - Alpha's investment in Beta On 1 April 20X3, Alpha acquired 180 million equity shares in Beta. On that date Beta had 200 million equity shares in issue. Alpha made a cash payment of $60 million to the former shareholders of Beta on 1 April 20x3 and agreed to make a further payment of $26.62 million on 31 March 20x6. Alpha had correctly accounted for the deferred payment in its financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X4 but has made no further entries in its financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X5. An appropriate annual rate to use in any discounting calculations is 10%. At a discount rate of 10% per annum the present value of $1 payable in three years is $0.7513. On 31 December 2004, Beta paid a dividend of $5 million. This was the only dividend paid by Beta in the year ended 31 March 20X5 and was appropriately recognised by Alpha. On 1 April 20X3, Alpha made a long-term loan to Beta of $25 million. The loans are included in the financial statements of Beta at this amount. These long-term loans attract interest at an annual rate of 8%. Both Alpha and Beta have correctly accounted for this interest in their individual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X5. No impairments of the goodwill on acquisition of Beta have been evident up to and including 31 March 20X5. Note 2 - Intra-aroun trading Alpha sinnlies Reta with a raw Alpha's investment in Beta On 1 April 20X3, Alpha acquired 180 million equity shares in Beta. On that date Beta had 200 million equity shares in issue. Alpha made a cash payment of $60 million to the former shareholders of Beta on 1 April 20x3 and agreed to make a further payment of $26.62 million on 31 March 20X6. Alpha had correctly accounted for the deferred payment in its financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X4 but has made no further entries in its financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X5. An appropriate annual rate to use in any discounting calculations is 10%. At a discount rate of 10% per annum the present value of $1 payable in three years is $0.7513. On 31 December 2004, Beta paid a dividend of $5 million. This was the only dividend paid by Beta in the year ended 31 March 20X5 and was appropriately recognised by Alpha. On 1 April 20X3, Alpha made a long-term loan to Beta of $25 million. The loans are included in the financial statements of Beta at this amount. These long-term loans attract interest at an annual rate of 8%. Both Alpha and Beta have correctly accounted for this interest in their individual financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X5. No impairments of the goodwill on acquisition of Beta have been evident up to and including 31 March 20X5. Note 2 - Intra-group trading Alpha supplies Beta with a raw material which it uses in its production process. Alpha applies a mark-up of one-third to its cost. Sales of the raw material by Alpha to Beta in the year ended 31 March 20x5 totalled $10 million. On 31 March 20X4 and 20X5, the inventories of Beta included goods costing $2 million and $3 million respectively which had been purchased from Alpha. Note 3 Alpha's other investments Apart from its investments in the equity shares and loans of Beta, Alpha has a portfolio of equity investments which are correctly classified as fair value through profit or loss. The investment income of Alpha for the year ended 31 March 20x5 currently correctly includes dividend income from this portfolio. However, the carrying amount of the portfolio has not yet been adjusted to its fair value at 31 March 20X5. On 31 March 20X5, the carrying amount of the portfolio was $32 million and its fair value $33.5 million. 3 (P.T.O. Note 4 Revaluation of property, plant and equipment (PPE) Both Alpha and Beta measure their PPE using the revaluation model. PPE is re-measured at the end of each financial year. In previous periods Alpha had recorded net revaluation losses of $3.5 million. These Beta, Alpha has a portfolio of equity investments which are correctly classified as fair value through profit or loss. The investment income of Alpha for the year ended 31 March 20x5 currently correctly includes dividend income from this portfolio. However, the carrying amount of the portfolio has not yet been adjusted to its fair value at 31 March 20X5. On 31 March 20X5, the carrying amount of the portfolio was $32 million and its fair value $33.5 million. 3 [P.T.O. Note 4 - Revaluation of property, plant and equipment (PPE) Both Alpha and Beta measure their PPE using the revaluation model. PPE is re-measured at the end of each financial year. In previous periods Alpha had recorded net revaluation losses of $3.5 million. These losses were correctly accounted for under the requirements of IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. In the financial statements of Alpha for the year ended 31 March 20X5, re-measurement gains of $5 million were entirely recognised in other comprehensive income. These gains related to the same properties which had previously suffered revaluation losses. Beta has only ever recorded revaluation gains. All depreciation and impairments of PPE are recognised in cost of sales. Note 5 - Equity settled share based payment scheme On 1 April 20X3, Alpha granted 500 senior executives 4,000 share options each. The options vest on 31 March 20x7. The options only vest for senior executives who remain employed by Alpha on 31 March 20X7. The following information is relevant: Date Fair value of option Number of executives for whom ($) the option is expected to vest 1 April 20X3 1.20 400 31 March 20X4 1.35 420 31 March 20X5 1.50 450 This transaction was correctly accounted for in the financial statements of Alpha for the year ended 31 March 20X4 and the cost was recognised as an administrative expense. However, no further entries have yet been made in the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X5. Required: Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of Alpha for the year ended 31 March 20X5. Where relevant you should round all figures to the nearest $'000. When I read two notes to our financial statements, they seemed to contradict each other. One of the notes referred to a legal case from December 20X4 in which we were being sued for damages by a customer. We originally thought Omega would have to pay damages of $5 million but the case was finally settled for $5-5 million on 20 October 20X5. The financial statements at 30 September 20x5 presented a liability for $5-5 million, despite this only being confirmed after the year end. A second note referred to the major fire in one of our factories on 15 October 20X5. The damage caused to the factory is estimated at $5-75 million. However, the note says that no adjustments have been made to the amounts recognised in the financial statements for the year ended 30 September 20x5 in respect of the damage caused by the fire. This will have a significant, but temporary impact on the cash flow of the business, however, it will not cause our own going concern status to be in doubt. The two events are not being treated consistently despite the financial amounts being similar Please can you explain these apparent inconsistencies? I am aware that a major customer, owing us a significant amount, became insolvent on 20 November 20X5. We are unlikely to recover much, if any, of this debt. Why don't the financial statements contain at least a note explaining to our shareholders what has happened? I am aware that the financial statements were authorised for issue on 15 November 20X5