J L 0Q2) Case: Owner of MV'jgstEess" v m \"m ijga\" u MV\" Restless\" with some cargoes on board was having an engine failure and drifting at high sea about 2&9... W miles distance to go to nearest distress port, Law; Malaysia. Master sent a distress signalsw desperately asking for help from any nearest salvage boat within the vicinity because the weather could be worsen anytime Few minutes later, a salvage tugboa, \"ng Iiga\" responded to Master 5 seeking 95... massistance. \"mijggf rushed and arrived three hours later after Master informed his W W accordingly Master signed the Lloyd Open Form (LOF) quickly as not to waste time lrther. 133%.. Wmooring ropes were thrown onto Salvage tugboat and to be towed safely to mm, a All went well until reaching 24 nautical miles away Luau; tthe weather turned very bad with strong winds. The sea became choppy with high waves that caused both the tugboat and the ship in pitching and rollingw Wthat cannot be controlled. Eventually the ship was supported by Harbour Master' s two tugboats to\" W safely at the inner anchorage. The next day, the ship owner of W" was approached by the salvor's representative at his office in Hamburg, Germany for reasonable rewards settlement. Adamantlyhsmp owner refused to acknowledge such salvage taken place. Thus the salvor quickly led writ of W the High Court to arrest the vessel in Lag-41,11, .J Question: If the valid requirement of salvage base on \"no cure no pay\