Jack and Jackie had been living together in Kansas for about a year.Jack wanted to marry Jackie, so he bought a $10,000 engagement ring and romantically gave it to her when they went out to dinner.She accepted his proposal of marriage and the ring and went about arranging their wedding ceremony for about six months later.She had to make several non-refundable deposits.But about 3 weeks before the wedding, without any explanation, Jack called off the engagement and demanded that Jackie return the engagement ring, which she refused to do.Is Jack entitled to get the ring back or can Jackie keep it?Heiman v. Parrish, 262 Kan.926 (1997)Use Google or another browser to find it.A format for your brief is posted in the Course Announcements along with my grading form.I will also send them to you by email.At the end of your brief be sure to include your personal comments about this case,and be sure to tell me if you agree or disagree with the court's majority opinion written by Judge McFarland and why.You may comment on the dissent by Judge Marquardt, but remember it is not the decision of the court.Also include your thoughts on how a couple wanting to marry could avoid a situation like this and how they might lessen or avoid the monetary impact when one of them breaks off the engagement, i.e. open a joint bank account equally funded to cover expenses, etc.