Jalyssa has started to work for a Sweetgrass Co. Her job is to organize sales parties at people's homes during which time the guests are shown, and encouraged to buy, various workout clothing. Jalyssa receives a commission (percentage of the sales) of all products that are sold at these parties. Jalyssa must pay her own expenses such as travel and the cost of a professional wardrobe and is responsible for paying Canada Pension Plan contributions. Sweetgrass Co. requires her to attend a certain minimum number of sales parties per month. However, Jalyssa manages her own schedule and her total profit depends entirely on her success at arranging parties and selling products. One day while Jalyssa is driving her own car to a sales party, Jalyssa negligently causes a serious car accident in which the other driver, Frank, suffers serious back injuries. Jalyssa is responsible for Frank's injuries. Sweetgrass Co. is responsible for Frank's injuries under the doctrine of vicarious liability O Both Jalyssa and Sweetgrass Co. are jointly responsible for Frank's injuries. Neither Jalyssa nor Sweetgrass Co. is responsible for Frank's injuries because the damages are too remote. Sweetgrass Co. is responsible for Frank's injuries under the doctrine of voluntary assumption of risk. Although nothing was stolen, a store security guard and senior staff member thought Al and Ed had stolen some clothing. After they exited from the store, the security guard and staff member called out "Ho! You there. Halt! What hath thou stolen? Attend here at once and leave not!" Ed and Al protested, but the guard and the staff member said the police had been called and they had no choice but to stay. When the police arrived, it was clear that no crime had been committed. Ed and Al can sue for what tort? Neither Ed nor Al can sue for any wrongdoing because they were not physically restrained. Only Ed has a cause of action for false imprisonment Both Al and Ed can sue for false imprisonment Both Al and Ed can sue for nuisance