Jamal agreed to buy 15 paintings from Ramli for RM150,000, payable in cash. Ramli agreed to Jamal's request for payment and delivery to be made in the following month. The paintings were burnt in a fire at the shop because of a short circuit and the shop was badly damaged. Advise Jamal as to who should be responsible for the losses under the Sale of Goods Act 1957. Would your answer be different if Ramli agreed to Jamal's request for new frames for the paintings to be changed before delivery and the paintings were destroyed by fire at Ramli's shop before they could be delivered to Jamal? (10 marks)