Jamal purchased a motorcycle from Getaway Automobiles, and the motorcycle's electric starter began malfunctioning after a week of the motorcycle's purchase. Jamal returned the motorcycle to the store, and the manager assured him that it was only a minor problem that could be fixed easily. In the next two months, Jamal visited the store five times for rectification of the same issue. Finally, he gave up and demanded that he get a cash back for the faulty motorcycle. Under these circumstances, which of the following is most likely to be true?

• Jamal is not entitled to revoke acceptance of the goods because he has used it.

• Jamal is entitled to revoke acceptance because he took back the motorcycle after the seller's assurance that the nonconformity would be cured.

• Jamal cannot revoke his acceptance because the value of the motorcycle is impaired by its use for over two months.

• Jamal can revoke his acceptance but is not entitled to damages for breach of warranty.