Jason was warned that a notorious diamond thief, Pete, planned to steal Jason's diamond, the Empress of India. Jason rigged to the front door of his home a shotgun designed to blast Pete when opened the door. Pete came to Jason's house under the pretext of selling him some life insurance. Jason was out of town at the time and, when Pete broke open the door, he was shot in the arm and injured. Pete now sues Jason for his injuries. Under the Katko case discussed in lecture, what is the likely result? Group of answer choices Jason will be liable only if he did not have a posted no trespassing sign Pete is a licensee and Jason is liable Pete is a trespasser and Jason is not liable Jason is not liable under any circumstances because trespassers are not protected under the law unless they are children Pete is a trespasser and Jason is liable