Jeff purchases a turkey fryer from BuyMore, Inc. He uses the turkey fryer to cook a turkey for himself on Thanksgiving. Unfortunately, he does not read the owner's manual, which contains multiple warnings about the dangers of improper turkey fryer use. Jeff heats up the oil in the fryer in his kitchen. Once the oil is 325 degrees, Jeff drops the frozen turkey into the fryer. The oilimmediately boils the frozen moisture in the turkey, causing oil to flow over the sides of the fryerand come into contact with the flames below the fryer. This in turn results in a devastating fire which ends up enveloping not only Jeff's kitchen but also his entire apartment and eventually the apartment unit above Jeff's, where Elise lives. Substantial damage is done to Elise's property, and Elise inhaled smoke as she escaped from her apartment, resulting in medical expenses. Elise sues BuyMore, alleging that the store was negligent in selling a turkey fryer to Jeff, who is illiterate and has been found guilty of negligently causing harm in several court cases over the years. Elise alleges that by running a simple background check on Jeff, BuyMore would have known not to sell him a turkey fryer. What is BuyMore's best argument that it does not owe any duty to Elise? (This question requires you to go through the factors for determining whether or not a duty is owed!)Group of answer choices-The fryer contained reasonable instructions that reduced the foreseeable risk of harm.-BuyMore was not in excl