Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

[Jewelry Robbery] Jewels by Jen was robbed of a significant number of diamonds by a robber later identified as Dillon. Jewels by Jen offered a

[Jewelry Robbery] Jewels by Jen was robbed of a significant number of diamonds by a robber later identified as Dillon. Jewels by Jen offered a reward of $10,000 to anyone who captured or provided information leading to the capture of Dillon. Kevin, a police officer in town, promised Jewels by Jen officials that he would apprehend Dillon. While on duty, Kevin arrested Dillon at a restaurant in town. He found Dillon after Ursula, Dillon's girlfriend, told Kevin about various places Dillon enjoyed eating. Jewels by Jen refuses to pay either Ursula or Kevin any of the reward money.

1. Which of the following is true regarding the offer of the reward?

Multiple Choice

  • It pertained to a bilateral contract that could be accepted only with consideration consisting of a promise.
  • It pertained to a bilateral contract that could be accepted only with consideration consisting of performance.
  • It pertained to a bilateral contract that could be accepted with consideration consisting of a promise or performance.
  • It pertained to a unilateral contract that could be accepted with consideration consisting of a promise.
  • It pertained to a unilateral contract that could be accepted with consideration consisting of performance

2. In a lawsuit between the bank and Kevin regarding the reward funds, who is likely to prevail and why?

Multiple Choice

  • Jewels by Jen is likely to prevail because Kevin only provided past consideration.
  • Jewels by Jen is likely to prevail because Kevin had a preexisting duty to catch Dillon.
  • Jewels by Jen is likely to prevail because Kevin's promise to catch Dillon was illusory.
  • Kevin is likely to prevail because his promise to catch Dillon resulted in a binding bilateral contract.
  • Kevin is likely to prevail because an enforceable unilateral contract exists based on his performance.

3. In a lawsuit between the bank and Ursula, regarding the reward funds, who is likely to prevail and why?

Multiple Choice

  • Jewels by Jen is likely to prevail because Ursula only provided past consideration.
  • Jewels by Jen is likely to prevail because Ursula was tainted by being Dillon's girlfriend.
  • Jewels by Jen is likely to prevail because no valid bilateral contract existed.
  • Ursula is likely to prevail because a valid bilateral contract existed.
  • Ursula is likely to prevail because an enforceable unilateral contract exists based on her provision of information leading to the capture of Dillon.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Elliott And Quinns Contract Law

Authors: Frances Quinn

12th Edition

1292251409, 978-1292251400

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

LG2 Describe the investment process and types of investors.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

6. How can a message directly influence the interpreter?

Answered: 1 week ago