Joaquin Menendez entered into a contract to lease a warehouse from Durabilt Commercial Properties. During the signing for the lease, Joaquin notices that the clause on utilities indicates that he is responsible for their payment. The Durabilt agent had agreed orally that Durabilt would pay one$-$half of the utilities. Joaquin mentions the understanding about the utilities before he signs. The Durabilt agent says, $$Oh$,$ right! Yes! We have that down in the file. We$$re fine.$$ After moving into the facilities Joaquin notices that there are problems with the roof leaking and rodents. These issues were not disclosed to him. The utility company has contacted him because he paid only one$-$half of his bill for the warehouse. Joaquin explained that Durabilt was to pay the other half. The utility company employee told Joaquin, $$They told me to contact you for payment.$$ Joaquin has filed suit to challenge the lease on the grounds of misrepresentation about the building$$s condition and the utilities payment. Which of the following is correct about the admissibility of parol evidence for Joaquin to make his case?

Question $15$ options:

Utilities clause$$Yes$/$Condition of the building$$Yes

Utilities clause$$Yes$/$Condition of the building$$No

Utilities clause$$No$/$Condition of the building$$Yes

Utilities clause$$No$/$Condition of the building$$No