Joe had sustained a hand injury which scarred his hand nine years ago. Joe and his father consulted Dr. Mack about a surgery to repair the scarring. Dr. Mack said, "I guarantee I can make the hand 100% perfect." Dr. Mack repeatedly solicited Joe and his father stating that he wanted the opportunity to experiment on skin grafting. Joe and his father consented to the operation forming a contract for the surgery with Dr. Mack. After the operation, Joe was left with a hand that was arguably worse than before the operation because Dr. Mack grafted skin from Joe's chest and his hand was covered in hair, subjecting Joe to ridicule, and causing Joe much humiliation and shame. Other doctors were consulted but no one could repair the damage caused by the skin grafting performed by Dr. Mack. Joe sued Dr. Mack and claimed that the damages he suffered were caused by Dr. Mack and that Dr. Mack breached the contract to repair his hand and even guaranteed results to make his hand 100% perfect.

Issue: Describe the issue in this case Rule: Explain what law the court would apply to this dispute. Explain what damages are appropriate if a breach of contract is found to have occurred. Analysis: Support your reasoning using legal principles Conclusion: Based on your analysis above, draw a conclusion to the dispute.