Joe sued Katya for damages resulting from a personal injury. The case was heard by a judge alone in Ontario in the Provincial Trial Court. The judge ruled in favour of Katya on the basis that Joe did not prove the fact that he had an injury. Joe wants to appeal on the grounds that the evidence he presented proved an injury. What is likely to happen?

a) The Provincial Trial Court will hear the case with a judge and jury for the jury to decide the question of fact.

b) The Court of Appeal will not hear the case, as it concerns a question of fact.

c) The Provincial Superior Court will hear the appeal, as it was already heard by an inferior court.

d) The Federal Court of Appeal will hear the appeal, as it was already heard by a provincial court.