John an employee of the Australian Multicultural Affairs Team posted "To all the gays. Hell Awaits You! Repent or burn in Hell faggots" on his personal social media account. The workplace suspended him without appeal and domestic remedies were not exhausted. John escalated the matter to the Australian Human Rights commission and they rejected his case stating it breached human rights conventions. John has now escalated the matter to the ICCPR under Article 19 - 'everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.' Advising he has been denied this right.

Write a memorandum of advice to the UN Human Rights Committee advising it as to the merits and demerits of the arguments likely to be put by John and the Australian Government respectively. What is the most likely outcome under the Human Rights Committee's considerations.