John Leonard initially set out to collect 7,000,000 Pepsi Points so he could obtain the Harrier Jet. It soon became clear to him that he "would not be able to buy (let alone drink) enough Pepsi to collect the necessary Pepsi Points fast enough. Reevaluating his strategy, he realized that buying Pepsi Points would be a more promising option. Through acquaintances, he ultimately raised about $700,000. On or about March 27, 1996, he submitted an Order Form, fifteen original Pepsi Points, and a check for $700,008.50. At the bottom of the Order Form, plaintiff wrote in "1 Harrier Jet" in the "Item" column and "7,000,000" in the "Total Points" column. In a letter accompanying his submission, plaintiff stated that the check was to purchase additional Pepsi Points "expressly for obtaining a new Harrier jet as advertised in your Pepsi Stuff commercial. Pepsi rejected his order. Leonard then sued Pepsi for breach of contract and demanded either the Harrier Jet or damages.

You should view the video and read the case. Summarize in a paragraph the legal principles used by the United States District Court to rule in favor of Pepsi. Do You believe the Court was correct in its ruling?