Jordan founded,owns, and manages EurAsia Gears,a pre-owned (used)automobiledealership business. One of the company'slongtime veteran sales associates is retiring, so Jordannow wants to hire a new, but experienced autosalesperson. She places an advertisement in the newspaper, and narrows the searchdown to two candidates for the sales associateposition. After the interviews, Jordansettles on hiring Kyle. But after casually researching Kyle's profiles and posts onsocial media,(LinkedIn, Twitter,Facebook, Snap, WhatsApp, Pinterest,YouTube, etc.) Jordan discoversthat Kyle is openlygay and involved in a same-sex relationship with a male partner that he intends to marry very soon.

Jordan calls Kyle and says that she cannot possibly hire a gay man for the position because EurAsia Gears was founded asa Christian business, which means that all of the company's business decisions and activities must reflect and comply withChristian values and principles. Hiring Kyle, she concludes, would directly contradict these values and principles.Kyle pushes back, retains an attorney, and a lawsuit arises. What is the likely outcome of this dispute?

• Jordan is not in violation of Title VII of the CRA.
• Jordan is sexually harassing Kyle.
• Jordan engaged in quid pro quo harassment of Kyle.
• Jordan engaged in disparate impact discrimination.
• Jordan is in violation of Title VII of the CRA.