Jose loves to go to hockey games and he has great season tickets close to the ice.During the last season, Jose was very unlucky.He was hit in the face with a puck that broke his nose, had an arena light fixture fall on his head creating a head injury he needed stitches for, and had a food server spill red wine on his very expensive new gym shoes ruining them.He sues the hockey arena for all three injuries and claims it is responsible for his medical bills to set his nose, get stitches in his head, and the cost to replace his ruined shoes.Under what legal theory will Jose bring all three of these claims?What is the arena's best legal defense? As to each of the three claims, explain whether Jose will likely be successful or whether the arena's defense will work and why.