J.S. C. 9230 (Communications Decency Act). First Writing Assignment: Lmateva Isbibut git Your submissions are due on Canvas by 2:00 p.m., 30 January: John Jones owns "Grinders" which is a "gentleman's club" in Mobile, Alabama. Grinders employs a number of young women to dance for the patrons of the club. Most of the young women are students at the University of South Alabama in Mobile. They dance in order to make money to afford tuition for their educational pursuits. The club has a policy of no fraternization by the girls with the customers, but that is hard for Jones to control. A former Grinders dancer, who now lives in Pensacola, Florida contributed comments on Facebook to a series of comments and short articles about the human trafficking that was taking place along the Gulf Coast and especially in the Mobile area because of the Port of Mobile. She specifically wrote that Jones was deeply involved in human trafficking and that he has been involved in it for a number of years. She wrote that Jones arranges for "his girls" to make trips to Orlando and Miami to service customers of very high powered business people who deal with foreign businessmen, foreign politicians, and other powerful foreign individuals. Assume that Jones has never been involved in human trafficking, that the woman's comments are defamatory per se, and that Jones has now contacted counsel to file an action for libel against the female author of the comments and against Facebook. Jones wants to file in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Alabama (Mobile). Mobile is in the Isbin Southern District of Alabama. Further assume that the author of the comments no longer has any specific contacts with Alabama. She is no longer a resident, she owns no property in Alabama, she does not vote in Alabama. In short, she has no physical or economic contacts with Alabama. 1. Would the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama have personal jurisdiction over the author of the defamatory Facebook posting? Support your opinion with analyses. AggunWeird no dol sisupon Non-Required Perspective Readings: 1. Note, Nicole Phe, Social Media Terror: Reevaluating Intermediary Liability Under the Communications Decency Act, 51 Suffolk University Law Review 99 (2018)