Juan v. Pablo Juan, a young lawyer in Los Angeles, interviewed with Pablo, a senior partner of a law firm in San Francisco. At the end of a pleasant interview that covered such topics as salary ($250,000), working hours (at least 1800 hours per year), moving expenses (expenses up to $10,000 covered) and employee benefits (including 401K, health, and dental insurance), Pablo tells Juan: "Although I have to discuss your potential employment with my partners next week, I really look forward to working with you. Please let me know if I can help you prepare for your relocation to San Francisco." Pablo and Juan then shake hands and Juan heads back to Los Angeles. Subsequently, Juan quits his job, gives 30-day notice to his landlord, rents an apartment in San Francisco, hires a moving company to pack and move all of his belongings, and moves to San Francisco. Juan then called Pablo to ask if he could start his job the following week. Pablo replied that due to the coronavirus pandemic, unfortunately, there was no job opportunity for Juan. Juan wants to recover his out-of-pocket expenses and lost wages from Pablo. 1. Is there an agreement between Juan and Pablo? Discuss in detail. 2. Assuming there is no enforceable contract between Juan and Pablo, under what legal theory may Juan proceed against Pablo? Will Juan win? Discuss in detail