Julie graduated from college and found a job that paid her $50,000 a year in her hometown of Auburn, Nebraska. Before she started the new job, Rafael, a friend of Julie's father, promised Julie that he would hire her for $250,000 if she were willing to move to Miami, Florida, where Rafael's company is located. Julie gave careful consideration to the opportunity and decided to make the move. She notified her new employer in Auburn that she would not accept the job, broke her lease on an apartment in Auburn and forfeited her $500 rental deposit, and leased an apartment in Miami and had her furniture moved there. After arriving in Miami, Julie met with Rafael who apologized and told her that the job he had in mind for her had been eliminated due to unexpected financial difficulty. Julie's best legal case against Rafael is which of the following?

	A.	for breach of bilateral contract since he made an offer, Julie accepted, and they had a binding contract
	B.	for promissory estoppel since there was not a binding contract in this circumstance due to lack of legal consideration on Julie's part
	C.	for specific performance as a remedy requiring Rafael to hire Julie for $250,000 for at least a year as required by the binding contract they made
	D.	for intentional infliction of emotional distress since Rafael knew or should have known that he would breach the unilateral contract with Julie