Justia Opinion Summary

In 2013 and 2014, the Nebraska Department of Natural Resources (DNR) issued orders and closing notices to holders of surface water permits for natural flow and storage in the Republic River Basin. Several appropriators, on behalf of themselves and a class of farmers who irrigate with water delivered by the Frenchman-Cambridge Irrigation District, subject to Nebraska's allocation of water under the Republican River Compact, brought these actions alleging regulatory takings claims against the State and the DNR. The district court consolidated the claims and granted the State and the DNR's motions to dismiss both of the appropriators' causes of action. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the DNR's streamflow administration did not result in a taking under the Nebraska Constitution because the Compact, as federal law, supersedes the appropriators' property interests; and (2) the alleged failure of DNR to regulate ground water pumping did not amount to a taking because DNR does not have a duty to regulate ground water.

https://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2017/s-16-558-s-16-560.html?utm_source=summary-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_content=seoreportad&utm_campaign=20170317-environmental-law-

1. The name of the case, court, and date decided

2. The issue and the holding

3. The background law necessary to understand the case

4. The reasoning for the decision.