K In 2016 and 2017 a poll asked American adults about their amount of trust they had in the judicial branch of government. In 2016, 68% expressed a fair amount or great deal of trust in the judiciary. In 2017, 77% of Americans felt this way. These percentages are based on samples of 1367 American adults. Complete parts (a) through (d) below. a. Explain why it would be inappropriate to conclude, based on these percentages alone, that the percentage of American adults who had a fair amount or great deal of trust in the judicial branch of government increased from 2016 to 2017. OA. Since a lesser percentage is present in the 2016 sample, a lesser percentage of people in 2016 than in 2017 must have a fair amount or great deal of trust in the judicial branch of government. B. Although a lesser percentage is present in the 2016 sample, the population percentages could be the same, but could not be reversed. C. Although a lesser percentage is present in the 2016 sample, the population percentages could be the same or even reversed. OD. Since a greater percentage is present in the 2016 sample, we cannot conclude that a lesser percentage of people in 2016 have a fair amount or great deal of trust in the judicial branch of government. b. Check that the conditions for using a two-proportion confidence interval hold. You can assume that the sample is a random sample. The Random and Independent condition holds, assuming a random sample. The Large Samples condition holds. The Big Populations condition can reasonably be assumed to hold. The Independent Samples condition holds. c. Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of Americans who expressed this level of trust in the judiciary, P-P2, where p is the 2016 population proportion and p2 is the 2017 population proportion. The 95% confidence interval is (). (Round to three decimal places as needed.)