Kadivar sees some problems with the Governmental Jurisprudence perspective. One issue he mentions is that:

Select one or more:

a.

What?

b.

The end justifies the means. This is seen as a utilitarian approach to the end or "the good." But, in reality, the means to this end is not at all clear, because the author has written a really long article and I am only skimming to find answers, you know?

c.

This will result in a statist religion and will destroy religious faith, spirituality, and pious conscience

d.

This will result in Iran having a leader not unlike a medieval pope, and that can't work as the Pope is a Catholic position, while Iran is an Islamic Republic