Kate enters into a valid, written contract to sell her $1967$ Camaro to Joe Mama, a well$-$known Instagram influencer and collector of classic cars, for $$225,000.$ The reason the price is so high is because Kate's car is one of only $602$ Camaro Z$28$s manufactured in $1967,$ and it was perfect. Garage kept its entire life. Only $500$ miles on the odometer. Original dealer paperwork still in the glove compartment.

When Kate was loading the car to be delivered to Mr$.$ Mama, she got cold feet. $"$I$\text{'}$m crazy to sell this," she thought to herself, "it's too valuable and it would be an affront to humanity to allow some jackwagon influencer to own such a stunning car. He'd probably just make stupid videos with it and then blow it up for clout."

Kate called Mr$.$ Mama and told him to keep his money. The deal is off.

Mr$.$ Mama immediately sued Kate for breaching their contract, and he asks the court to order specific performance of the contract. Will Joe Mama win?

No$,$ because Kate's car, although rare, is not unique.

No$,$ because Joe Mama is a jackwagon.

Yes, because the car is very rare.

Yes, because the car is fungible.