Kate enters into a valid, written contract with Josh pursuant to which Josh agrees to transport Kate's classic 1967 Camaro to a car auction in Michigan. Kate and Josh agree in the contract that Kate will pay Josh $3,000 for his services. The day that Josh is supposed to pick up the car for the trip to Michigan, his car-hauling truck breaks down, and he calls Kate to tell her he won't be able to take the car to Michigan for the auction. Kate immediately began calling every car transportation company within a 150-mile radius of her home, and the only company available to deliver her car to Michigan in time for the auction is a company called Platinum Car Hauling Company, the most expensive car hauler in the industry. What's more, since Kate gave Platinum such short notice, they will only agree to transport her car if she pays a late-notice premium. When all of the fees are added up, it will cost Kate $5,000 to have Platinum deliver her car to Michigan. Seeing no real choice in the matter, Kate signs a contract with Platinum to deliver her car, and Platinum delivers it without incident. Kate sues Josh for breaching the delivery contract with her. Assuming Kate's efforts to find alternative arrangements for transporting her car were reasonable, what remedy will Kate likely receive? Group of answer choices

Consequential damages of $2,000.

Specific performance of her contract with Josh

Compensatory damages of $2,000

Reliance damages in an amount equal to the reasonable cost of having the car transported, even if that amount is less than $5,000.