Keisha entered into a contract with Ron to cater all of his parties. Larry interfered with those arrangements and persuaded Ron to move his busines from Keisha to Larry. Which tort would be appropriate for Keisha to file agair Larry? Choose 2 answer choices. Tortious interference with a prospective advantage. Tortious interference with a contract. Wrongful interference with a business relationship. Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. In what situation would justification be appropriate? In what situation would justification be appropriate? Justification is appropriate only for wrongful (tortious) interference with business relationship or prospective advantage Justification is only appropriate for wrongful (tortious) interference with a contract or a contractual relationship. Justification is appropriate for either type of wrongful interference tort. A plaintiff can use justification for either type of wrongful interference tort