Ken is tharibus at Allan because he mistakenly believes that Alan stole his $($Ken$\text{'}$s$)$ job. Ken

Alan is string peacetuany on a park bench, talking on the phone, when Ken finds him. Ken stiands approximately fifteen feet away, swings the sock around and brandishes the bottle, but otherwise doesn't move. Ken screams, $"$I$\text{'}$m going to carve your eyes out of your face" Ken is $10$ kinches shorter and $60$ pounds lighter than Alan.

Alan looks up and makes prolonged eye contact with Ken. Alan smiles brightly and says. "Would you mind lowering your voice? I$\text{'}$m on the phone." Ken screams again, and hurls the bottle against the tree behind Alan, shattering it $($the bottle, not the tree$).$ The bottle whizzed by Alan's head but doesn't touch Kim, nor do any of the glass shards. Alan never even flinches.

Ken leaves. Alan continues with his phone call as if nothing ever happened.

If this incident ended in litigation, Ken would most likely be liable for:

False imprisonment, because Alan felt unable to move.

Wrongful interference with a business relationship. It was Alan's fault that Ken lost his job.

Nothing. There is no evidence that Alan was afraid.

Battery. Ken clearly aimed the bottle at Alan.

Assault, Ken's words and actionat were reasonably believable threats of imminent physical harm.