Kevin agreed to buy Herbert's farm tor $450,000, and all the terms ot the oral agreement are settled. Herbert agrees to let Kevin come onto the property before the closing date so that he can renovate the kitchen and build a new barn before he takes over formally. By the time Herberttells Kevin that he has changed his mind and that he will not complete the transaction on the closing date, Kevin has already spent $35,000 on the property. Multiple Choice 0 Kevin can use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to force Herbert to complete the transaction and give him the farm in exchange for $450,000. 0 Because otthe Statute of Frauds, Kevin cannot get the farm. but he can sue Herbert torthe tort of deceit and recover the $35,000. 0 Kevin can ask a court to order specic performance of the contract because he has spent a lot of money on the property. 0 Under the Statute of Frauds. Since their agreement was not evidenced in writing, Kevin cannot enforce it in court, and cannot recover the $35,000. Multiple Choice O Kevin can use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to force Herbert to complete the transaction and give him the farm in exchange for $450,000. O Because of the Statute of Frauds, Kevin cannot get the farm, but he can sue Herbert for the tort of deceit and recover the $35,000. O Kevin can ask a court to order specific performance of the contract because he has spent a lot of money on the property. O Under the Statute of Frauds, since their agreement was not evidenced in writing, Kevin cannot enforce it in court, and cannot recover the $35,000. O Under the doctrine of part performance, Kevin can request that the court order specific performance of the contract