Kim Blackburn, the Plaintiff, rented a bounce house from the Defendant Super Fun Co$.,$ as entertainment for her son$$s birthday party. Dan Farmer, an employee of the Defendant, installed the bounce house in the backyard of the Blackburn$$s home the morning of the party. During the installation, Farmer was in a hurry and forgot to place stakes and ties, which would secure the bounce house to the ground. During the party, a strong wind lifted the bounce house, as well as its occupants, $50+$ feet in the air. Upon its descent, the bounce house slammed into the Plaintiff$$s home causing damage to her roof and injuring her son, Sam. Both Kim and Sam Blackburn brought suit against Super and Farmer for negligence seeking damages for the home$$s roof and Sam$$s injuries. Super Fun Co$.$ claims Kim Blackburn is contributorily negligent for the severity of Sam$$s injuries. Kim used Great Glue to close a laceration to Sam$$s eyebrow but accidentally dripped glue into Sam$$s eye causing partial blindness.

$1.$ To what extent is Super Fun Co$.$ liable to Kim Blackburn for the damage to her roof due to the negligence of Dan Farmer?

$2.$ To what extent is Super Fun Co$.$ liable to Sam Blackburn for the injuries to his eye?

$3.$ Suppose that Super Fun Co$.$s insurance pays both Sam and Kim$$s claims does Super Fun Co$.$ have standing to bring an action against Dan Farmer? If so$,$ what type of claim and on what legal basis?

$4.$ What are the business lessons that may be learned from this scenario?