Kindly answer these 4 questions after reading the case

Mamta Toys Mamta was the owner of a Store which dealt in._ ixnported electronic toys. She\" had started the busi- I ness in 1986 by renting a shop located in the UPSCale Connaught Place. market. Her _ business kept on ourishing day by day as she had started advertising through the Internet as well as other electronic media, By 2003. the business reached to such 'a great height of success that she thought of taking help and support from her family. 'Inthe month of November 2003, She had put forth this proposal before her family. After a series of discussions within the family, it was decided that Mamta would likely take retirement in a couple ; of years and her 17-year old daughter Alya Wpuld .- .help her run the business hence forth. In return, Alya would be entitled a monthly stipend of ?5,000. It HR.\" \"an...\" ' was decided (orally) that Mamta would deposit the amount in a recurring deposit (RD) bank account in her own name and handover the total amount to Alya once she retired. However, when Mamta retired at the end of the year 2015, she decided to donate the total deposited amount to a local charitable dispen- sary and handed over the store jointly to her daughter and son, Jignesh, who had returned to India after completing his BBA from abroad. It was also resolved that both, the sister and the brother, would run the business jointly and share the income thereof equally. Although Mamta, being the sole owner of the shop, had the exclusive right to give anything in charity as per her will and wish, but still this seemed in contradiction with her words and promise to Alya to allow her a fixed incentive for helping her in running the business. As per the law of contract, an employee can take refuge in law if the employer breaches the terms of the contract of their employ- ment. One can understand that in this entire inci- dent, Mamta had involved her daughter in order to take help from her, and, in return, had promised to pay the latter a sum of