kindly assist with the answers.

Question 2 [22] 2.1 Sarah and Philemon meet online on a dating site one weekend. Sarah suggests that they meet for dinner the following Saturday evening. Philemon replies with an OK. Sarah buys herself a very expensive outfit and has her nails done. On that Saturday evening Sarah arrives at the restaurant and while waiting for Philemon, orders a very expensive red wine. Philemon never pitches at the restaurant, and Sarah must pay for the wine and the meal she had. Feeling very hurt Sarah decides to claim the money for the meal as well as the money she paid for her outfit from Philemon. Referring to the above-mentioned case study, evaluate if the requirements for a valid contract were met. In your answer also indicate if Sarah can claim the money back from Philemon for the meal and the outfit she had bought. (10) 2.2 Gary has placed a poster outside his shop advertising the sale of a certain brand of washing powder for R15.00. Mary sees the low-price washing powder and goes into the shop to buy the washing powder as displayed on the poster. Gary refuses to sell it to Mary at that price and asks Mary to leave. Mary contends that Gary must sell her the washing powder at the price advertised because she has accepted a valid offer from Gary. Discuss whether Mary is correct. (Note the Consumer protection Act is not applicable.) 2.3 Sifiso is studying at Stadio. His dad, who is very proud of Sifiso, agrees with Sifiso that he will buy Sifiso a car on condition that Sifiso obtains an LLB Degree. Is this a valid contract