Kindly help me solve all of the following problems please A dignitary of a business college needs
Question:
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f281c3dc_607667b8f27d5e1a.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f289a7c1_608667b8f2878b66.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f2906d70_608667b8f28d5615.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f2975300_609667b8f2949dc7.jpg)
Kindly help me solve all of the following problems please
A dignitary of a business college needs to know whether the extent of graduates who utilize measurable induction inside the primary year after graduation is more noteworthy than 0.6. Assume the test measurement was discovered to be 3.92. At the = 0.10 degree of importance, what might be the end?
Answer utilizing just the data introduced in this inquiry; don't allude to your responses to whatever other inquiries that may have a comparable set-up.
Peruse cautiously, and select all that apply!
Can't reason that the genuine mean number of graduates who utilize factual deduction one year after graduation is more prominent than 0.60. That is, the Dean can't guarantee that a normal of in excess of 60 alumni utilize measurable induction one year after graduation.
Can't reason that the genuine extent of graduates who utilize factual surmising one year after graduation is more noteworthy than 0.60. That is, the Dean can't guarantee that over 60% of graduates utilize factual deduction one year after graduation.
Reason that the genuine extent of graduates who utilize measurable induction one year after graduation is more prominent than 0.60. That is, over 60% of graduates utilize measurable surmising one year after graduation.
Reason that the genuine mean number of graduates who utilize measurable deduction one year after graduation is more prominent than 0.60. That is, a normal of 60 alumni utilize measurable induction one year after graduation.
Reject the elective theory
Presume that the genuine mean number of graduates who utilize factual induction one year after graduation is more prominent than 60/300 = 0.20. That is, over 20% of graduates utilize measurable surmising one year after graduation.
Reject the invalid speculation.
Presume that the genuine extent of graduates who utilize measurable deduction one year after graduation is more prominent than 0.10. That is, over 10% of graduates utilize factual derivation one year after graduation.
Neglect to dismiss the invalid theory
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f29e0c34_609667b8f29b5863.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f2a48031_610667b8f2a27b7d.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f2a9a833_610667b8f2a787f5.jpg)
![image text in transcribed](https://s3.amazonaws.com/si.experts.images/answers/2024/06/667b8f2b03de1_610667b8f2add2aa.jpg)