KRAYDEN'S CYCLE COMPONENTS

INTRODUCTION: COMPANY, PRODUCT, AND SUPPLY CHAIN

Krayden's Cycle Components (KCC) is a high-end specialty fabricator that manufactures one product with many variants. The basic product is known as a rolling chassis, a key component used in manufacturing motorcycles. While there are variations across the industry, a rolling chassis typically consists of a motorcycle frame, front forks, wheels and tires, and handlebars.1

KCC is a first-tier supplier to an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) that produces motorcycles in three versions: Sport, Cruising, and Retro. The OEM purchases KCC product and attaches its well-known proprietary engine and gearbox, wiring and gauges, seat, fenders, various components, and gas tank with iconic emblem. The OEM is KCC's sole customer as it essentially requires KCC's full capacity.

KCC manufactures each frame from steel tubing but purchases a variety of parts from suppliers. Workers at KCC attach these parts to the frame to complete the rolling chassis. Figure 1 illustrates the supply chain. The suppliers of wheels, front forks, and handlebars are second-tier suppliers. These vendors provide parts that are ready to be attached to the frame. The tire vendor is considered a third-tier supplier. The company that builds the wheels acquires tires (that meet contract specifications directly negotiated by the OEM) and provides a complete wheel assembly ready to be attached to the front fork and rear frame.

KCC has had numerous problems with delivery and quality over the past several years. Because the problems have been so acute, the company has employed four different plant managers in the last five years. Management acknowledges the supply chain has difficulties; unfortunately, there is virtually no room for error in meeting delivery schedules and product quality targets. Further, KCC has been under increased scrutiny from its stockholders because earnings have deteriorated over the past three years. See Tables 1-4 for KCC's financial information (income statement, balance sheet, statement of cash flows, and unit cost information).

The economic recession that ended around the summer of 2009 has enabled the OEM to expand production and sales. The company's sales have increased by 1,000 units per year since 2010. By 2015, KCC was delivering 30,000 units to the OEM; management believes this level of output represents capacity. Thus, production above 30,000 units is not possible without staff overtime or an investment in additional plant resources that will increase hourly throughput. Management at KCC has received notice that the OEM plans to increase production by 3,750 units next year (12.5%) and to demand price concessions of $200 per unit as specified in the contract.

THE PRODUCT MIX AND OUTSOURCED PARTS

The OEM produces motorcycles for three different market niches; therefore, KCC produces three distinctly different frame geometries as follows:? Sport bikes emphasize speed and agility. Customers expect rapid acceleration and responsive handling. ? Cruising bikes emphasize power and comfort. They allow riders to enjoy long-distance touring. ? Retro bikes appeal to customers who appreciate classic designs. They are typically smaller than cruising bikes and more stable than sport bikes. For each frame geometry, the OEM offers three possible handlebar types. Because riders are various sizes, handlebars can be configured in a variety of heights, widths, and lengths (straight bars or bars pulled back toward the rider).

The OEM offers three different wheel set possibilities. Wheel sets consist of one front wheel and one rear wheel. The different wheel designs are: ? Chrome spokes.? Cast aluminum polished (silver) alloy wheels. ? Cast aluminum anodized (black) alloy wheels.

The OEM offers four unique tire choices for each frame type. Thus, KCC could purchase as many as 12 different tire models to meet market demand (three frame types x four different tires per frame). Factors that differentiate the tires include: ? Bias-ply (characterized by a round profile and tall sidewalls). ? Radial (characterized by a flat profile and short sidewalls). ? Grip (soft?better road grip but shorter tread life; hard?poorer road grip, but longer tread life). ? Tread design (differences in the number of grooves in the tire pattern). ? Number of layers (known as plies) from which the tire is constructed; using more layers results in a stiffer tire. The OEM contracts directly with the tire manufacturer to supply specific tires to the wheel manufacturer. Much engineering effort has gone into identifying the proper tires and wheels for each type of motorcycle. The wheel vendor receives and mounts the appropriate tire on the wheel set and then delivers the set to KCC. The tire manufacturer sells its products to different OEMs, as well as to aftermarket customers.

Recently, the OEM has complained to KCC about chassis that vibrate and exhibit poor handling qualities when the completed motorcycle is test driven. Engineers at KCC have traced the source of the problem to the tire manufacturer. A wheel/tire combination that is not balanced properly causes vibration and is a control and safety issue. The solution requires placing the wheel/tire set on a machine to determine the location of the imperfection causing the imbalance. A small weight is attached to the wheel to offset the tire imperfection and to remove the vibration. Because of pressure from the OEM to deliver a quality chassis, KCC purchased a wheel balancing machine and tested each set before installing it on their chassis. The quality delivered to the OEM has improved, but management at KCC is unhappy because the OEM refuses to increase the contract price to help offset KCC's additional cost of equipment and labor.

The supply chain has additional complications. One of KCC's suppliers (a second-tier supplier that produces handlebars) is also a subsidiary of the holding company that owns KCC. This supplier has contracts with manufacturers of bicycles, scooters, and power chairs. On several occasions, this supplier has missed scheduled deliveries. When confronted, management explained they had external customers whose orders must be filled. At certain times of the year, demand exceeds the supplier's ability to meet it. As a result, KCC management has scrambled to find suitable suppliers (at much greater cost) in order to meet their own delivery schedules.

PROCESS DESCRIPTION

KCC receives an order from the OEM exactly three hours before the specific chassis is needed on the OEM's assemblyline. The company employs four production line workers who are cross-trained to perform multiple functions.

Figure 2 illustrates the manufacturing process for KCC, a manufacturing cell that includes the following processes:

Step 1. Tube cutting and assembly. Steel tubes arrive by forklift at Step 1, the cutting and welding process. Cutting. Using a computer numerically controlled (CNC) machine, steel tubes are bent and cut to proper angles and lengths that match the engineering design specifications for each frame type?Sport, Cruising, or Retro. Welding. After the tubes are cut, they are clamped to a jig that holds them stationary at the proper angle for welding. A robot tack-welds each joint, which is a temporary weld to hold the assembly in preparation for final welding. Once the frame is completely assembled by tack welds, the robot permanently welds the joints.

Step 2. Weld cleanup and preparation. The welded metal frame advances to the next process where the welds are smoothed and polished, then to a cleaning bath where the frame is cleansed of oils and surface contamination prior to the powder coating process.

Step 3. Powder coating. KCC powder coats, rather than paints, the frames. Consistent with environmental sustainability issues, the powder coating process emits almost zero volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In addition, any overspray can be captured and reused. Powder coating is a dry powder that does not require a solvent. The powder coating is robotically sprayed within a booth by a nozzle that imparts a negative electrical charge to the powder. The powder electrostatically adheres to the grounded frame. The frame is heated to approximately 400 degrees Fahrenheit for around three minutes to melt the powder that flows to produce a smooth, strong, glossy finish.

Step 4. Fork assembly. The forks are manually attached to the frame.

Step 5. Tire balancing. The wheel/tire set is tested for balance, and any necessary modifications are made.

Step 6. Wheel/tire assembly. The wheel/tire assembly is manually attached to the frame.

Step 7. Handlebar mounting. The handlebars are mounted on the frame.

Step 8. Loading the frames. The frames are carefully loaded into a cargo trailer for transport.KCC'S JUST-IN-

TIME/ JUST-IN-SEQUENCE INVENTORY SYSTEM

The OEM produces motorcycles for eight hours each weekday. KCC makes eight deliveries (once per hour) during this period. The frames are delivered just-in-time (JIT) and just-in-sequence (JIS). JIS delivery implies the first frame unloaded from the truck is the next frame needed for production by the OEM. KCC is linked to the OEM's production information system via an electronic data interchange system. The system identifies the appropriate frame geometry, handlebar type, wheel type, and tire specifications for each order.

Management at KCC has been working to improve operating efficiency and profitability. Because KCC operates according to Lean principles, the company strives to hold minimal parts inventory. Thus, on-time delivery and the quality of purchased parts are crucial to keep production lines operating at desired output levels. If KCC causes the OEM to stop its line because of delivery or quality problems, the contract allows the OEM to bill KCC for lost production time at a rate of $2,000 per minute.2 The OEM believes this clause is justified because it loses contribution margin if production is brought to a halt. In some cases, KCC has passed these costs along to second-tier suppliers that caused KCC to miss a delivery.

KCC has met on several occasions with its suppliers to try to resolve supply issues. Vendors have been frustrated by the Lean system demanded by KCC. To reduce their exposure to line stoppage costs, some second-tier suppliers have responded by increasing inventory levels. Additionally, some suppliers have purchased redundant manufacturing equipment on key production processes that can be used if the primary equipment fails, further adding to manufacturing costs.

Management at the OEM believes in developing long-term strategic partnerships with its suppliers. Thus, each supplier is rewarded with a multiyear contract. The OEM prefers to use a single supplier for each component, rather than to contract with two (or more) different companies for a component. KCC has the exclusive contract to produce rolling chassis for the OEM, and has recently been awarded the next contract covering five years of production. As a result, KCC made significant investments in retooling and plant modernization during the current year. Unfortunately, the investments did not increase KCC's capacity sufficiently to meet expected demand.

THE MANAGEMENT DILEMMA

KCC's management operates as one participant in a complex supply chain. They are managing relationships involving multitier suppliers and a demanding delivery schedule. Further, stockholders are expressing concern over KCC's declining profitability in recent years. Management has not developed a plan for addressing the increase in production required by the OEM, nor have they developed an understanding of the financial consequences of accepting the new contract.

Required: Please answer these Questions

3. The OEM produces its final product in three versions with many variants. How many unique product combinations are possible? Explain. What are some examples of complexity (and related costs) that result from offering three product versions with many variants? What challenges does this complexity present for management accountants?

4. How can differential analysis be applied here to determine if it would be profitable to invest in new equipment to increase capacity for a constrained resource?

5. What can we learn about the process flows from Figure 2? Consider the following issues in your response:

a. Is there a bottleneck in the process? If so, where is it? Explain.

b. How much processing time does each finished product require?

c. How many units per hour is the process capable of producing?

d. Is there a relationship between the process bottleneck and output per hour? Explain.

6. The idea behind Lean concepts is continuous improvement. Lean manufacturing systems expose problems. Identify some problems that the Lean system has exposed.

Figure 1: Supply Chain Third Tier Second Tier @ Handlebars Powder- Steel coating tubing First Tier Figure 2 : Process Diagram ( Time Shown in Minutes : Seconds ) Fork assembly Process time 1:45 Tire balancing Process time 3:00 Step 4 Step 5 T Powder coating\\ Process time 3:00 Wheel assembly Process time* 2:15 Step 3 Step 6 I I Weld clean - up\\ 2:00 Degrease and Handlebar mounting* powder coat prep : 30 Step 2 Process time* 1:30 Step 7 Steel tubing Cut tubing $30 Welding Transport to loading delivered by forklift Setup time ( jig ) : 15 queue for JIT JIS Process time 3:15 Step 1 delivery Step 8 To the DEM :` One delivery per hourIncome Statement Years Ended December ]1 2015 2014 ELIZ Sales $11 1,009,000 $1 13, 1 00, 060 $1 12,000, 000 Cost of goods sold* TO, IZE,OLD 76. 720, 000 Glass; Illiaryill 30,009,000 $4, ITE,OCO $5, 2010, 000 Operating Expenses Freight-out 1.50 0,00 0 4,50 0, 0CO 4,000, 00.0 Research and development General and administrative 9, inc. and 9.5010,00 0 Total operating expenses 16, 50 0, 000 17, 200, 000 Operating income 1.3. 601,000 17, 57E .OCO 10.010.0, 000 Nonoperating Expenses ; Interest 1, 100,000 1, " OC, OCO 1 , 10, 00.0 Income before faces 16, ATE, OLD 16.960,0 00 Pluvision fur inLITTLE Lower 1223, 100 5, 4 8 6, 175 5, 6:54, 340 Net income $3 470.900 $10, 186, 625 $1 1 215, 560 Basic net income per share $1.278 SC. BED $10.371 Diluted net income per share* SL. 3 46 $0. 357 Weighted average shares outstanding ." Basic 30.502,00 0 $0. 50 0. 0CO 30.5010. 000 Diluted 31, 750 00 0 $ 1. 750,0CO 31, 750, 000 Dividends per share $722 $0. 13 Average selling price $3, TOO Units produced and sold* 30.000* * 2 5, 0CO 28, 000 Average unit cost 52, \\] $2. TAIL "' Mingjonent he loves the quantity represents ansting capacityTable 2 ASSETS Goodwill Total assets \\Inventory Notes payable Total liabilities Current Assets : Current liabilities . Common stock Total current assets |Prepaid expenses \\Shareholders' equity . |Accounts payable Retained earnings |Accrued expenses |Land and buildings Total current liabilities |Deferred tax assets Income taxes payable Trade receivables , net Total shareholders' equity Property and Equipment . Property and equipment Total property and equipment Cash and cash equivalents less : Accumulated depreciation Total liabilities and shareholders " equity Balance Sheets as of December 31 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY \\$15, 000, 000 \\$80. 475, 000 \\580. 475. 000 2015 \\65. 70,0. 000 134 . 700. 000 \\59.000, 000 |25, 000. 000 157 . 50,0. 000 131 . 000. 000 13. 500, 000 \\39. 00,0. 000 12. 010 .000 144 . 965, 000 18. 500, 000 14 . 775. 000 13. 775, 000 1 , 000 , 000 \\6. 250. 000 19 . 700. 000 15, 000 . 0.00 1515, 000 1700 . 000 \\$75. 135. 000 \\$75. 135, 000 \\$13. 900, 000 131 . 250, 000 2014 12 . 885, 000 131 . 000.000 120. 00,0. 000 17 . 885, 000 \\52. 250. 000 \\21 . 50,0. 000 \\$8. 500, 000 122. 50.0. 000 12. 010 . 000 |42.50,0. 000 \\38 . 125. 000 12. 050. 000 15. 00.0 . 000 15. 675. 000 17 . 200 . 000 19 . 300 , 000 1. 000 , 000 1 . 250, 000Table 3 \\Dividends Investing : Net income Financing : Increase in cash Increase in payables Increase in inventory Increase in receivables \\Operating cash flow : Investment in equipment Increase in accrued expenses \\Decrease in prepaid expenses Increase in deferred tax assets \\Decrease in income taxes payable Change in cash from operations Plus noncash expenses : Depreciation Changes in current assets and liabilities : Cash Flow Statement for Year Ended December 31 , 2015 \\(15 , 000 , 000 ) \\$1 . 100, 000 122, 680. 900 124.970.900 \\$8.470. 900 2015 16.50,0.000 13, 500, 000 \\6, 580, 900) 17.5.35,0.00 \\6 , 580, 900) | 2.50.0 , 0010 ) ( 4, 200, 000 ) \\1575, 000) \\550,000) 500, 000Tires Materials ; \\Front fork Total unit cost \\Direct labor . |Handlebars \\Steel tubing |Welding rods flux \\Electricity for machines \\Powder coating materials Wheel set ( front and rear ) constant on a per - unit basis ) : Total per cash flow statement Table 4 : Unit Cost Information \\Heating and cooling building per year * $50 per hour / 30 , 000 units ) \\Degreasing chemicals and supplies \\Depreciation ( generally fixed in total ) : |Materials , WIP , and FG inventory handling \\14 line workers * 40 hours per week * 50 weeks \\Indirect labor : Plant supervision and plant maintenance Costs that vary by individual unit ( example of one product ) \\Overhead ( generally varies in total with production , but is relatively \\$16 . 500 ,000.00 \\Approximately 2015 \\$2 . 025.00 \\$2 , 700.00 $2, 700. 83 $1 12.50 $200.00 $550.00 $1 1. 00 350.00 700.00 650.00 125.00 20.00 10.00 25.00 13.33 30.30 7.70 8.50