Question
Kuperman describes the effect of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the Responsibility to Protect as eroding the norm of sovereignty. In contrast, proponents of
Kuperman describes the effect of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the Responsibility to Protect as "eroding the norm of sovereignty." In contrast, proponents of the Responsibility to Protect would describe this effect as redefining sovereignty.
Which do you think is the better way to characterize this development? Why?
Step by Step Solution
3.39 Rating (155 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
While both eroding and redefining describe the impact of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the Responsibility to Protect on the concept of sovereignty ...
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Applied Regression Analysis And Other Multivariable Methods
Authors: David G. Kleinbaum, Lawrence L. Kupper, Azhar Nizam, Eli S. Rosenberg
5th Edition
1285051084, 978-1285963754, 128596375X, 978-1285051086
