L ADVANTAGES * JEMS offers a centralized platform for the management of probation records, court records, case files, and other pertinent data pertaining to juvenile offenders. This streamlines case management procedures and enhances data organization, accessibility, and accuracy. This is in favor of making decisions based on evidence and enhancing juvenile justice procedures over time. Plus, it automates many administrative tasks, such as scheduling court dates, generating reports, and keeping track of case statuses. This results in less paperwork, a reduced chance of human error, and better, more efficient handling of juvenile cases; It also facilitates communication and teamwork among judges, probation officers, attorneys, social workers, and other service providers in the juvenile justice system; Real-time notifications and updates are assured. DISADVANTAGES * Dependency on JEMS as the primary case management tool may pose risks in case of system failures, outages, or disruptions. Contingency plans and backup procedures are necessary to mitigate the impact of technical issues on juvenile case processing and supervision. Therefore, it requires ongoing maintenance, updates, and technical support to ensure optimal performance and compatibility with evolving technology standards; Implementing JEMS or similar case management software requires significant upfront investment in technology infrastructure, training, and organizational change management. Resistance to change and technical issues during implementation may hinder adoption and effectiveness. . Furthermore, JEMS stores sensitive information about juvenile offenders, including personal, legal, and health-related data. Ensuring data security, confidentiality, and compliance with privacy regulations is essential to protect the privacy rights of juveniles and prevent unauthorized aceess or breaches. 7 ,. : o 3.YOUTH ASSESSMENT AND SCREENING YG S I / INSTRUMENT (YASI) e The "Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument\" (YASI) is a comprehensive risk assessment tool ;'i used in the juvenile justice system to evaluate the risk level and needs of juvenile criminals. / Developed by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJIDP), the YASI is [ utilized by juvenile justice agencies in various jurisdictions across the United States. X / By evaluating a number of domains, such as demographies, family dynamics, past delinquent behavior, mental health issues, substance abuse history, educational attainment, and peer ,/ relationships, the YASI offers a thorough assessment of the criminals. A complete understanding of / the juvenile's background and circumstances is made possible by this all-encompassing approach. / f/ / / / / ,r/ ADVANTAGES !/ .'/' 0 Based on the results of the YASI assessment, juvenile justice practitioners can / develop individualized treatment and supervision plans tailored to the specific / needs and risk factors of each offender. This personalized approach allows for /f targeted interventions that address the root causes of delinquent behavior and / promote positive outcomes which ensures consistency, reliability, and faimess in / decision-making processes related to case management, supervision, and .-/ intervention planning. 7 = s b DISADVANTAGES . Not all juvenile offenders may have equal access to technology or internet-enabled devices necessary to utilize Edovo's platform, particularly those from low-income backgrounds or underserved communities, This could exacerbate existing disparities in educational and rehabilitative opportunities among youth in the justice system. . Some may lack proficiency in using technology or navigating digital platforms like Edovo, which could hinder their ability to fully engage with educational and rehabilitative content. Without adequate support and training, youth may struggle to benefit from the resources available through Edovo. . Remote access to Edovo's platform may pose challenges in terms of supervision and monitoring of Jjuvenile offenders' online activitics. Without proper oversight, youth may be exposed to inappropriate content, engage in cyberbullying, or misuse communication features within the platform. VIDEOCONFERENCING es remote communication and T LR enders, justice system stakeholders, T T eliminating the need for physical ADVANTAGES > By using videoconferencing, offenders can attend court proceedings from a distance, reducing the cost of transporfation and ensuring their participation in the legal system without the logistical challenges of being physically present. It also minimizes the risks associated with transporting juveniles to courtrooms or other locations, reducing exposure to potential threats, conflicts, or escape attempls. = Videoconferencing enables juvenile offenders to maintain contact with their families, attorneys, counselors, and service providers through virtual visitation, legal consultations, therapy sessions, and educational instruction, ensuring continuity of care and support. = Videoconferencing technology extends access to educational, mental health, and rehabilitation services for juvenile offenders located in remote or underserved areas, overcoming geographical barriers and promoting equity in service delivery DISADVANTAGES = Videoconferencing may encounter technical issues such as connecectivity problems, audiovisual glitches, or software malfunctions, disrupting communication and potentially delaying legal proceedings or service delivery. = Virtual interactions via videoconferencing may lack the interpersonal dynamics and nonverbal cues present in face-to-face interactions, impacting the quality of communication, rappori-building, and therapeutic relationships between juvenile offenders and justice system stakeholders. = Videoconferencing raises privacy and confidentiality concerns, particularly regarding the transmission and storage of sensitive information exchanged during legal consultations, therapy sessions, or multidisciplinary meetings. = Not all juvenile offenders may have access to the technology or internet connectivity required for videoconferencing, particularly those from low-income backgrounds or underserved communities, exacerbating disparities in access to justice and services. = Videoconferencing in the juvenile justice system must comply with legal and ethical standards regarding confidentiality, informed consent, due process, and privacy rights, ensuring the protection of juvenile offenders' rights and interests. VO Mot e o / edovo .'.-' / .".IJ .'; ,"' Steven Cleidir Mendes Ramos l.,-" Course: Juvenile Delinquency _J.-'f Instructor: Suzanne Thibault / / May, 2024 .';' . N = \\ _ \\ = \\ b Introduction AT_'\" i This presentation will explore the transformative role of technology in the juvenile justice system, focusing on \\ their assessment and impact on the offenders, justice system professionals, and the broader community. \\ Through a comprehensive analysis of the use of technologies such as YASI, Edovo, videoconferencing, and ankle bracelets, we will highlight the advantages, challenges, and ethical considerations associated with integrating technology into juvenile justice practices. By understanding the opportunities and limitations of these technologies, we can identify best practices, promote evidence-based approaches, and enhance the effectiveness and fairness of juvenile justice nterventions. \" MAIN TOPICS = Technologic Assessment in the Juvenile Justice System - Potential Advantages and Disadvantages . Ethical Issues = / JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM'S USE OF TECHNOLOGY Technology is used in various ways within the juvenile justice system to improve efficiency, effectiveness, and outcomes. Electronic monitoring, case management software, predictive analytics, rehabilitation and education technology, telecommunication technology, biometric identification systems, are examples of technologies used in juvenile justice. For the purpose of determining the value of technology in each of these scenarios, a succinct analysis will be given. 7 1. ELECTRONIC MONITORING TECHNOLOGY Electronic monitoring devices, such as ankle bracelets or wristbands, are worn by juvenile offenders to track their movements and whereabouts, These devices utilize GPS technology or radio frequency signals to monitor the location of the juvenile in real-time, By providing continuous monitoring capabilities, electronic monitoring technology enhances supervision of juvenile offenders, even outside of traditional supervision hours. This helps ensure that they are adhering to the terms of their probation and staying out of trouble. Knowing that their actions are being monitored can deter them from engaging in delinguent behavior or violating court orders. Probation officers can respond promptly to potential violations and provide appropriate support and interventions. ADVANTAGES Juvenile justice officials can track the whereabouts and activities of juvenile offenders in real time with the use of clectronic monitoring, which improves supervision and lowers the possibility that they will violate court orders or probationary conditions. As a result, they have an option to stay in their communities under supervision by using electronic monitoring instead of secure confinement. This can help with reintegration into society, preserve educational continuity, and support families. Additionally, authorities can quickly intervene and provide support services to address underlying issues and stop further delinquent behavior when they identify possible violations or deviations from court-ordered restrictions through electronic monitoring. DISADVANTAGES Electronic monitoring raises privacy concemns for criminals, as their movements and activities are continuously monitored and tracked. This can infringe upon their privacy rights and autonomy, leading to feelings of surveillance and intrusion. When placed under electronic monitoring they may experience stigmatization and social isolation due to the visible presence of monitoring devices on their ankles or wrists. This can have negative psychological and social consequences, affecting their self-esteem and relationships with peers. In general, it raises issues with stigmatization, privacy, efficacy, technological constraints, and the danger of relying too heavily on surveillance. To guarantee the welfare and effective rehabilitation of young offenders, juvenile justice organizations must carefully take into account these variables and find a balance between support and supervision. ~ 2. JEMS The "JEMS" (Juvenile Electronic Management System), which is employed by certain juvenile courts and probation depariments in the United States, is a practical illustration of case management software used in the Juvenile justice system. It is designed to streamline the management of cases and probationary supervision by providing a centralized platform for storing, accessing, and tracking relevant information and activities related to Jjuvenile offenders. By offering a user-friendly, integrated platform for accessing and managing juvenile case information, JEMS improves the efficacy, efficiency, and transparency of probation supervision and juvenile case management. It supports evidence-based practices in juvenile justice administration, enhances data accuracy, and makes communication and collaboration among stakeholders easier. In the end, JEMS promotes favorable outcomes for young people involved in the legal system by helping to modemize and optimize juvenile justice procedures. CONCLUSION As we conclude this exploration of technology-enabled juvenile justice, it becomes evident that these advancements offer both tremendous opportunities and significant challenges. On one hand, technologies like YASI provide comprehensive risk assessment, enabling tailored interventions and promoting positive outcomes for youth offenders. Edovo offers access to education, vocational training, and rehabilitation programs, empowering juvenile offenders with valuable skills and opportunities for growth. Videoconferencing facilitates communication and collaboration among justice system stakeholders, ensuring continuity of care and support for youth involved in the system. Ankle bracelets for electronic monitoring enhance supervision and accountability, promoting compliance with court orders and reducing the risk of recidivism. CONCLUSION However, alongside these benefits, we must also address the challenges and ethical considerations inherent in the use of technology in juvenile justice. Issues such as privacy concerns, digital divide, technical limitations, and dependency on vendor services require careful consideration and mitigation strategies. Moreover, the human element of justice- empathy, connection, and individualized support-must not be overshadowed by technological innovations. In conclusion, the use of technologies in the juvenile justice system represents a pivotal moment in our approach to youth rehabilitation and reintegration. By harnessing the power of technology responsibly, ethically, and collaboratively, we can maximize its potential to promote positive youth development, reduce recidivism, and create a more equitable and just society for all. Together, let us continue to innovate, adapt, and advocate for the effective and equitable use of technology in juvenile justice, ensuring that every young person has the opportunity to thrive and succeed RESOURCES https://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/criminal-justice-process/impact-of-technology/technology-in- juvenile-justice- systems/#:text By%20reducing%20administrative%20burdens%20%20enhancing.and%20reintegrat ion%20of%20young%20offenders Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI) - WCWPDS Youth Justice - UW Madison wisc.edu) Microsoft Word - Chapter 1 Intro - revised.doc (ny.gov) The ethics of aesthetics: Stigma, information, and the politics of electronic ankle monitor design: The Information Society: Vol 36, No 3 (tandfonline.com) Sharing Data and Information in Juvenile Justice: Legal. Ethical, and Practical Considerations - Etten 1994 - Juvenile and Family Court Journal - Wiley Online Library. Justice, Crime, and Ethics - Michael C. Braswell, Belinda R. Mccarthy, Bernard J. Mccarthy - Google Books THANK YOU! Steven Cleidin NTT D LAWDISADVANTAGES o While predictive analytics tools like the YASI aim to forecast future outcomes based on historical data and risk factors, their predictive accuracy may be limited. Factors such s changes in circumstances, interventions, or external influences may affect the validity of predictions made by the YASI; A risk of bias in the administration and interpretation of the YASI can also present. Factors such as cultural differences, language barriers, and subjective judgments by assessors may introduce bias into the assessment process. o The YASI relies heavily on quantitative data and risk scores to inform decision-making, which may overlook qualitative factors and individual circumstances that are relevant to the juvenile's case. Overreliance on numerical scores may lead to oversimplification of complex issues and inappropriate allocation of resources. Juveniles with higher risk scores may be perceived as more dangerous or problematic, leading to negative stereotypes and differential treatment by justice system stakeholders. Hence the use of risk assessment tools like the YASI may contribute to the stigmatization and labeling based on their risk scores. 4. EDOVO Edovo is a secure digital platform designed to deliver educational content, vocational training, life skills development, and rehabilitation programs to incarcerated individuals, including juvenile offenders. . ADVANTAGES . Edovao gives juvenile offenders access to a variety of educational resources, such as literacy programs, GED preparation classes, and vocational training. This allows youth to continue their education and leam valuable skills while in detention, promoting academic success and future opportunities. It also provides vocational training programs in a variety of trades, including automotive repair, construction, culinary arts, and information technology. They can gain job skills and certifications that will improve their employability upon release, lowering the likelihood of recidivism. . It also includes cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) modules and interventions designed to address criminogenic thinking patterns and behaviors among juvenile offenders. These programs assist youth in developing coping strategies, improving decision-making abilities, and promoting positive behavioral change. With this flexibility, they can continue their learning and therapy outside. DISADVANTAGES . While Edovo offers interactive features and personalized leamning experiences, it may not fully replicate the hands- on, experiential learning opportunities available in traditional educational and vocational settings. Some juvenile offenders may prefer or benefit more from in-person instruction and practical training; Relying heavily on technology-based interventions like Edovo may lead to dependency on digital platforms and reduce opportunities for face-to-face interactions and interpersonal relationships, which are also essential for social and emotional development among juvenile offenders . The digital nature of Edovo's platform could also increase the risk of distraction among juvenile offenders, leading to reduced focus and engagement with educational and rehabilitative content. Without adequate supervision and structure, youth may be tempted to misuse technology or engage in non-productive activities. The integration of technology into the juvenile Justice system brings with it Data Security and Integrity: The storage and transmission of juvenile justice data raise concerns about data security, integrity, and unauthorized access. Safeguarding data against breaches, hacking, or misuse 15 crucial to maintain trust in the justice system, protect sensitive information, and uphold the rights of youth offenders to privacy and due process. Digital Divide and Equity: The digital divide refers to disparities in access to technology and internet connectivity, which may disproportionately affect marginalized communities and exacerbate existing inequalities in the juvenile justice system. Ensuring equitable access to technology-enabled interventions and services is essential to promote faimess, inclusivity, and equal opportunities for all youth offenders, regardless of socio-economic background or geographical location. Bias and Discrimination: Technology-mediated decision-making processes, such as risk assessment algorithms, may inadvertently perpetuate bias and discrimination, particularly if they rely on historical data that reflect systemic inequalities or implicit biases in the justice system. Addressing algorithmic bias, transparency, and accountability in the design and implementation of technology is essential to mitigate the risk of unfair or discriminatory outcomes for vouth offenders. Informed Consent and Autonomy; Juvenile offenders may have limited autonomy and decision-making capacity, particularly when it comes to consenting to the use of technology-mediated interventions or data collection practices. Respecting the autonomy and agency of youth, obtaining informed consent, and ensuring meaningful participation in decision-making processes are essential ethical considerations in the use of technology in juvenile justice. Human Connection and Rehabilitation: While technology offers valuable tools for assessment, education, and supervision in juvenile justice, it cannot replace the human connection, empathy, and individualized support essential for rehabilitation and positive youth development. Balancing the benefits of technology- enabled interventions with the need for human interaction, therapeutic relationships, and personalized care is crucial to uphold the dignity and well-being of youth offenders. Addressing these ethical issues requires a holistic approach that considers the rights, needs, and perspectives of youth offenders, as well as the broader goals of faimess, justice, and rehabilitation in the Jjuvenile justice system. By upholding ethical principles, promoting transparency, and engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, we can harness the potential of technology to support positive outcomes for youth involved in the justice system while safeguarding their rights and dignity