la) Affordability & WI =QX BUS (To Section ! Wzz 93 Style . W3 20.z Verrealized 3 Computer total Normalized Score Seete 9. 30 B jyo- JEAN 40 3 -12 64024 2 4 9 322 1xo.J=3:3 5x13=0. 1 3x0.2 0 Computer has the highest score and is the best by result2 . ( 20 points ) Apply AHP to re-develop the weights for the three values : Affordability , Quality , and Style to HWla . Compute CI for the pairwise comparison matrix; if it is greater than 0 . 05 , then modify the matrix to make it totally consistent . Compare these weights with the normalized values of the original weights you have* assigned in HWla , and discuss the differences . 3 . ( 20 points ) Apply AHP to the remainder of HWla and compare the resulting total scores of the 3 candidate computers with the normalized values of the scores you obtained in HWla , and discuss the differences and any insights gained . 4 . ( 20 points ) For 4 choices A , B, C , and D , a decision- maker has the following pair - wise comparison matrix and rankings of the confidence in their validity :" A B C D ( 1 ) CVS . D Highest 1 12 1/4 1 18 ( 2 ) AVS . C 7 N 4 ( 3 ) BVS. D DOWD 1 112 ( 4 ) BVS . C 7 ( 5 ) A VS . B ( 6 ) AVS . D Lowest Use the rankings as the basis to make the matrix totally consistent . Oliver Y'` @ 2019 AHP - 18