LA Fitness enters into an employment contract with Alex for personal training services. Alex agrees that he will be paid $\backslash (50\backslash \%\backslash )$ of all business he brings in as well as a base salary. As part of the deal, LA Fitness asks Alex to sign a provision saying that if he is assaulted by anybody in the gym that he waives his right to sue LA Fitness and can only go after the individual who assaulted him instead. Is this provision enforceable? Yes, because Alex was paid valid consideration for this agreement Yes, because Alex had the right to reject this provision but agreed to it instead Yes, because Alex can still sue the individual who committed the wrongful act No$,$ because companies cannot contract around gross negligence or intentional torts