Laney protests on the town square using terms many consider hateful, racist, and anti-Semitic.One day Laney is arrested for disturbing the peace. At trial, Laney argues that his First Amendment freedom of speech is being violated by his prosecution.

Laney's trial:

a. Would have been in state court and the case could eventually be heard in the US Supreme Court because Congress applied the Bill of Rights to the states through incorporation.

B. Would have been in state court and any appeals can only be in state court because disturbing the peace is a state crime.

C. Would have been in state court and any appeals can only be in state court because the First Amendment protects speech that we find distasteful and that makes us uncomfortable.

D. Would have been in federal court if the federal government thought it was a case of federal importance.

E. Would have been in state court and the case could eventually be heard in the US Supreme Court because of the incorporation doctrine.

F. B. and C.