Larry filed an age discrimination charge with the EEOC alleging that his former employer terminated his employment in violation of the ADEA. The EEOC investigated the charge and issued a letter of violation that stated the employer violated the statute. Larry subsequently sued the employer. During trial, the employer moved the court to exclude the letter of violation as inadmissible. How should the court rule based on EEOC v. Manville Sales Corp., 27 F.3d 1089 (5th Cir. 1994)? Question 20 options: a) Deny the motion since the inclusion of the letter would not be an abuse of discretion. b) Grant the motion since the inclusion of the letter would be an abuse of discretion. c) Deny the motion since a determination by the EEOC that a violation of the ADEA occurred would not pose a danger of unfair prejudice. d) Both a and c