Last Saturday, when Iris shopped around in Sheung Wan, she was attracted by a 1:14 red Ferrari toy car placed on the shelf with a price tag of $99. She recognized what a bargain it was, immediately went into the toy store and indicated to Jamie, owner of the toy store, that she accepted the offer and would take the red Ferrari toy car for $99. However, Jamie told his that there had been a mistake and that the oorrect price of the toy car should be $991]. Iris insisted that she was entitled to get the toy car at $99. When Jamie would not give it to her at that price, Iris was very disappointed and said that she would sue Jamie for the purchase of the toy car at $99. After his left, Jamie amended the price on the price tag of the red Ferrari toy car as $990. On Sunday, Kathy prepared to buy a birthday gift for her son, Leslie. When she went into Jamie's store and saw the 1:14 red Ferrari toy car placed on the shelf, she was so happy that it was the model that her son liked very much. She immediately bought the toy car at $991] and went home to celebrate her son's birthday. When Leslie received the birthday present, he was very happy when he saw that it was a high speed remote control car as shown on the package of the ear. However, when he opened the gift, he was very disappointed as it did not possess the remote control function. Kathy was very angry and prepared to request a refund from Jamie. Required: (a) In relation to law of contract, advise Jamie if his could sue her for the toy car at $99. (8 marks) (b) Referring to the context of'Srtles afGauds Ordinance (Cap 26), advise Kathy whether she can reject the toy car and request for a remd. {12 marks}