Laura and Stu were known drug dealers. One day, Stu asked Laura if Laura would sell him a supply of illegal drugs because Sta's regular supplier had not been providing Stu with the amount of drugs that Stu wanted. Laura agreed to sell Stu $5,000 worth of illegal drugs, and Laura and Stu both signed a written contract to this effect. Also, Stu gave $250 to Laura in consideration of Laura expediting the delivery of the drugs from her standard delivery period of seven days, to two days. Laura did not give the illegal drugs to Stu after two days. Stu requested that Laura return the $250, but Laura refused to give back to Stu the $250 that Stu had given Laura in consideration. If Stu brings an action against Laura to recover the $250, what is the most probable result? a) Judgment for Laura, if it was impossible for Laura to get the drugs in so short a time period. b) Judgment for Laura, because under the doctrine of illegality when there has been performance under an illegal bargain, the court will leave the parties where it finds them. c) Judgment for Stu, because the defense of illegality is not available to a party who is in pari delecto with the defendant. d) Judgment for Stu, if he relied to his detriment on the offer from Laura by promising others that he would sell them illegal drugs that he received from Laura