law 101

Moving to another question will save the response Question 1 points Mark enters into a written agreement to sell a parcel of land to Sam. At the time the agreement was executed, Mark had consumed several alcoholic beverages. However, Mark's ability to understand the nature and terms of the contract was not impaired. Sam did not believe that Mark was intoxicated. What is the legal status of this contract? it is legally binding on Mark and Sam It was void as a matter of law. It is voidable at Mark's option It is voidable at Sam's option. Moving to another con il Save this so HUAWEI Moving to another question will save this response estion 2 Question 2011 1 points Najah and Mariam decided to start a business selling cars. They agree to be equal partners. They rent a location, and buy new and used cars. They sell cars for 2 years when Mariam has a heart attack and dies. What happens? Their arrangement was a partnership and is dissolved because Mariam died. Because their arrangement was a partnership, it is treated the same as ans Corporation and Mariam rights and responsibilities pass to her heirs. Najah retains 100% of the business and continues business as usual because when a partner dies and there are no written agreements, the remaining partner or partneramume te rights and responsibilities of the deceased partner as they relate to the business O Mariam's heirs inherit her part of the business and business continues as usual. Question 2015 Moving to another question will save this response HUAWEI Moving to another question will save this response 1 points estion 3 Raphael is a driver for Shorty's Hamburger Service. He drives their frozen meat to their various restaurants Monday-Friday 8am to 5pm. After his last delivery on Friday and on his way back to the warehouse to return his truck, Raphael stopped and had two beers and steak. At 6:30 PM, he was driving back to the warehouse in his company truck and struck and killed a child crossing the street. Shorty's is not liable for the accident because Raphael was not acting within the scope of his employment. Shorty's is liable for the accident because Raphael was driving their truck Shorty's is liable for the accident because Raphael was acting within the scope of his employment O Shorty's is not liable for the accident because its policies say drivers should drive carefully and follow all taws Question Moving to another question will save this response HUAWEI